User talk:Slinger9

Hi! I am sorry to tell you that I removed your recent edit on the article on Crawley. Wikipedia only reports on what has been covered already by secondary (newspapers, books, magazines) sources. If you can find a newspaper article about your discovery, by all means reinsert the information, referencing the newspaper article. It is an interesting piece of information, but it must be verifiable. Gtwfan52 (talk) 00:37, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Avro, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jim1138 (talk) 00:50, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:08, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Sockpuppet?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Slinger9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry to say that I am not this person Ryan Kirkpatrick, this is my first time on this site. Crawley is where I lived (in Southgate), The cinema issue has been with me since I was young, the AVRO 1000 was in a sales brochure at a Farnbourogh Airshow around 1959/1960. My name is Steve Reece (You can find me on Facebook) living in Telford UK, I did not fully understand the editing issue, as I mistakenly thought this was a type of discussion siteSlinger9 (talk) 08:36, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

You seem to have been caught up as a 'false positive' in a sockpuppet investigation. Since the blocking admin has no objection to unblocking you based on the evidence, I have unblocked this account.

And, this is not a discussion site. We are trying to build an online encyclopedia. Any talk page discussions should be restricted to improving articles, not discussions of topics. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:42, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]