User talk:Slazarus09

Welcome!

Hi Slazarus09! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 21:10, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Brennan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jake Brennan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused. These articles were well sourced and no unverifiable claims were made in them. Can you point to the exact pieces of information that need better sourcing? Slazarus09 (talk) 13:33, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disgraceland (podcast) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Disgraceland (podcast), is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Double Elvis Productions moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Double Elvis Productions, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:47, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jake Brennan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jake Brennan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Brennan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 13:53, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Disgraceland (podcast) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disgraceland (podcast) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disgraceland (podcast) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:42, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Double Elvis Productions for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Double Elvis Productions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Elvis Productions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:45, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:53, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the note. At this point there is nothing I can do to really contribute to the conversation. I understand now that it's possible for me to have both written an article incorrectly from a non-neutral POV and also for the subjects themselves to pass the notable tests written out in wikipedia's code of conduct. It's clear to me that there's nothing I can really add at this point besides a commitment to be more careful when authoring pages. As I'm still learning how to navigate the space, let me know if there is anything else I can do to do better. Slazarus09 (talk) 02:23, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=I don't have multiple accounts. The idea that you're claiming multiple accounts without pointing to the second account clearly demonstrates that this punitive decision was done without any evidence or explanation.~~~~}}

. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:48, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is fairly evident that PomKiwi220 (talk · contribs) is your other account. Vanamonde (Talk) 20:41, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it's not. I have a single account, but feel free to suggest otherwise. No idea who that is although it's clear that it's a new user who edited these pages. I've backed off the whole process. Good luck Slazarus09 (talk) 21:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]