User talk:Sinkplil

Sinkplil, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sinkplil! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Please use the edit summary to show what you did and please avoid making potentially controversial changes such as replacing existing photos with different photos without any explanation whatsoever. Graywalls (talk) 05:24, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Luisito

Si te refieres al artículo en español, las solicitudes van en es:Wikipedia:Tablón de anuncios de los bibliotecarios/Portal/Archivo/Protección de artículos/Actual. Yo no soy administrador/bibliotecario, así que no lo puedo proteger. © Tbhotch^™ (en-3). 21:11, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Missvain (talk) 02:05, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

If you resume harassment of other editors when your block expires, then your account and you as a person will be blocked indefinitely. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 02:28, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sinkplil (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

... Wikipedia is a Democratic Party web encyclopedia?

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Please keep in mind trollish unblock requests will result in having your talk page access revoked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.