User talk:SilverXDestiny

Hello, SilverXDestiny, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! – Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

RfA

I see that you started filling out the form for an RfA. I suggest you reconsider applying for adminship at this time as it too early in your Wikipedia time to be applying for adminship. You need to be editing for awhile and establishing yourself as a trusted editor before you can pass an RfA. See Advice for RfA candidates and Adminship is not for new users for additional advice. If you wish, I can delete the RfA that you started. Please leave me a note if you would like me to do so. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: I noticed that in your application, but unfortunately that will likely not be enough. RfA !voters prefer to see a breadth of experience and knowledge about Wikipedia besides just enthusiasm. If you submit an RfA now, it will likely be shortly closed as WP:NOTNOW. I do recommend deferring the idea of applying for adminship until a minimum of six months from now while you gain more experience editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: Alright. I hope the RfA turns out as you hope. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:10, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Wikipedia:Request an RfA nomination

Hi there, welcome to Wikipedia. It looks like you're interested in becoming an administrator - your edit here actually added your name to a list of editors who are willing to provide a nomination. Please read WP:Advice for RfA candidates -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 15:34, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption?

Hi again, noticed you've got the {{dated adoptme}} on your user page - are you looking to be adopted? -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 15:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, yes I did. Oh wait, oops... accidentally deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SilverXDestiny (talk • contribs)

Would you like to be mentored, I'd happily offer - I would however ask you to withdraw your RfA per the below comment. There will be plenty of time for adminship, but first we can focus on you becoming an awesome editor if you'd like?

-- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 15:49, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ve~! Sure! Wait... becoming an awesome editor? I am already awesome, and I am an editor.

May 2016

Hello, I'm Mlpearc. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Enchilada, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 16:26, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Makololo tribe, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 16:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Congo River. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mlpearc (open channel) 16:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:List of really, really, really stupid article ideas that you really, really, really should not create. Mlpearc (open channel) 16:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ve~! But how can I cite myself? I own an enchilada stand.

You can't, WP:USERG. Mlpearc (open channel) 16:38, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am a reliable source for enchiladas because I make enchiladas and own enchiladas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.131.203.50 (talk) 19:58, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Coderzombie (talk) 17:15, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]