User talk:Shokuwarrior

Welcome! to Wikipedia!

Hello Shokuwarrior, this is Exir Kamalabadi, and I hope that you are having fun with Wikipedia. First of all, welcome to Wikipedia! Find something that can be improved, either in content, grammar or formatting, then fix it. Don't be afraid. Be bold! If you do something wrong, there is always someone who will clean up the mess.

Here are some links that you may find helpful:

How to edit a page
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
Manual of Style
Community Portal. You can get some work over there.
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
What Wikipedia is not
Wikiquette, the Wikipedian etiquette

Here are also some tips that you might find useful:

Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes
Create a User page so that others can know you
Go to the Village Pump or the Help Desk if you need Wikipedia related help, or the Reference Desk for general questions.

Finally, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page when you need help!

Exir Kamalabadi ^{Join Esperanza!} 01:30, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who episode titles

Hi, Shokuwarrior. Please don't add episode titles that haven't been confirmed by the BBC or another official source. Freemaagyeman.com, despite its name, is a fan site with no special authority. Wikipedia has a policy requiring reliable sources for all information, and the editors of List of Doctor Who serials are trying to enforce it. If you feel that we're being too strict, you may discuss the matter on the article's talk page, but please stop adding titles and removing the hidden text which exist to explain the policy to editors. Thank you. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 03:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, Shokuwarrior. My understanding is that freemaagyeman.com isn't actually Freema Agyeman's site, but a fansite devoted to her. Fan sites are generally not considered reliable sources for Wikipedia's purposes. You are correct that Wikipedia is the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit, but the contents of articles are subject to the consensus of participating editors. The previous consensus has been not to list episodes until they are confirmed by the BBC, Doctor Who Magazine, or another official source. Please do not continue to add these episode names to the article — however, if you wish to discuss the matter further, you are welcome to do so at Talk:List of Doctor Who serials or at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Doctor Who. Thanks. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 04:09, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm desperately trying to avoid breaking WP:3RR here! According to the press release at Outpost Gallifrey (click here), 'three new episode titles' will be revealed in DWM issue 380. As this isn't officially on sale until 1 March 2007, please refrain from adding links and/or articles for Blink (Doctor Who), The Sound of Drums (Doctor Who), Human Nature (Doctor Who episode) (the latter two currently redirect to List of Doctor Who serials) or any similar titles. Please revert your edits to the Series 3 section of List of Doctor Who serials. Thank you. Silver Nemesis 17:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, SHokuwarrior. I'd like to add my suport to those here who are asking you to stop adding unconfirmed titles to the list. While your first edits were doubtless in good faith, your continued editing after the situation has been explained borders on vandalism. Percy Snoodle 17:43, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last of the Time Lords

Thank you for experimenting with the page Last of the Time Lords on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.--Rambutan (talk) 17:01, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tables

Hi - thanks for your edit to List of Doctor Who DVD releases. Unfortunately, your edit broke the table. This was for two reasons:

Although you added a comment saying "series 3 td carried down", you didn't update the rowspan of the series 3 cell; so it wasn't carried down.w
You removed the line containing |}, so the table wasn't closed, and all the remaining content in the page was forced into the table.

Please see Help:Table if you have any questions about table syntax. Percy Snoodle 14:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again - you've added another two rows, but not updated the rowspan. Please do take a look at Help:Table. Percy Snoodle 15:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Captions

Hi, please don't change the captions to quotes. It was decided that they should be descriptive.--Rambutan (talk) 09:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia works by consensus. It was decided by a group of editors - in fact I disagred - that the captions should not be quotes (for copyright reasons) but should instead be informative descriptions. We must respect the common decision: a majority desire non-quotey captions, so that's what happens. By the way, you should always sign your posts on talkpages, by typing --~~~~.--Rambutan (talk) 18:10, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

Please do not use styles that are unusual or difficult to understand in articles, as you did to The Sound of Drums. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rambutan (talk) 08:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Jabf20.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jabf20.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Harrypotter5dvd.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Harrypotter5dvd.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 17:50, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Harrypotter5dvd.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Harrypotter5dvd.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:41, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Porcupine (prickle me! · contribs · status) 19:50, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You know this. You've been told about it before. So please just don't add stuff that's not sourced. Porcupine (prickle me! · contribs · status) 14:10, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Time Crash is already listed. Please don't repeat it again.--Porcupine (prickle me! · contribs · status) 09:46, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I happen to agree that "Time Crash" should be listed in the table, but it's my duty as a moderator to point this out: You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of Doctor Who serials. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 19:52, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Doctor Who serials

Why did you remove Jack? Will ^(talk) 20:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see you didn't. Still, the source for Billie's return says three - Jack's return doesn't make him a companion again. Will ^(talk) 20:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Voyage of the Damned (Doctor Who)

Please stop edit warring and discuss the change of image on the talk page. The previous image was already in danger of being deleted; we do not want to risk it having deleted again because of it being orphaned. Thank you. — Edokter • Talk • 17:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but the Eye Of Horus website is not a reliable source; even they have all cast labeled as "TBC" (to be confirmed). — Edokter • Talk • 22:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Voyageofthedamned.jpg

I have tagged Image:Voyageofthedamned.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Rettetast (talk) 00:07, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. This is because you have continued to add unsourced information after having ignored all these many warnings. Porcupine (prickle me! · contribs · status) 10:22, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mariosonic.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mariosonic.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Cheers, L A X 21:55, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

· AndonicO ^Hail! 14:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Silence in the Library

Can you please give the page number and article title so that the reference can be put in properly. thanks Stuart DD _{contributions} 13:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DWM 393

Hey, see this, please, before adding anything else - it's not out yet, so you can't have a copy!! —TreasuryTag talkcontribs 13:56, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The policy is that stuff has to be verifiable. Nobody has copies yet offically; if you happen to have found an early special one under a car, then that's no good to the rest of us. Please stop inserting the info, therefore. —TreasuryTag talkcontribs 14:08, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, if you have a copy; please read RTD's bit under "Gallifrey..." and say when the start date is supposed to be, then we can check if you're right when the right one comes out tomorrow. —TreasuryTag talkcontribs 14:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of Doctor Who serials. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. — Edokter • Talk • 14:05, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you do have a copy, then please post some details on the article's talk page in the future. I suggested we keep it in for the moment until other receive their copy. — Edokter • Talk • 14:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Award

Congratulations!~

		The WikiProject Doctor Who Award
		For your work on Doctor Who articles! Type 40 (talk) 21:57, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That said, please make sure to follow WP:CITE in future... —TreasuryTag—t—c 08:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Partners in Crime

Hi, just to say that I reverted your edit to the caption and included a reason; it's all very complicated, isn't it! —TreasuryTag—t—c 17:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RS

Please read the above policy. Actually read it; and realise that Eyeofhorus isn't a reliable source. —TreasuryTag—t—c 08:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Partners in Crime (Doctor Who). Thank you. —TreasuryTag—t—c 18:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Wallacegromit.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wallacegromit.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:51, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Next Doctor, you will be blocked from editing. _Talk Islander 10:38, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Doctor Who serials, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ╟─Treasury Tag►contribs─╢ 10:39, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Untouchable (Girls Aloud song). Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ~~ [ジャム]^[t - c] 15:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Xfactor09.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Xfactor09.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:52, 14 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:52, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The X Factor (UK series 6)

Please do not add speculation to Wikipedia articles, as you did with The X Factor (UK series 6). This is because it does not comply with WP:SPECULATION and WP:V. Thanks, DJ 14:16, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Xfactor09.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Xfactor09.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 00:15, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The X Factor (UK series 6), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Please read WP:PROSE; it is not appropriate to include tables instead of text. Thanks. Dale 22:15, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:All-star-band.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:All-star-band.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:53, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:All-star-band.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:All-star-band.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:54, 23 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:54, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Simpsonshd.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Simpsonshd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:34, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Eleventhdoctor.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Eleventhdoctor.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 22:23, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:11doctor trailer.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:11doctor trailer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Edokter • Talk • 23:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:11doctor trailer.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:11doctor trailer.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Edokter • Talk • 23:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:11doctor trailer.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:11doctor trailer.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ╟─Treasury Tag►Speaker─╢ 23:41, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Curious as to why you removed a free-use image and replaced it with a fair-use image? Cirt (talk) 12:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of Doctor Who serials. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. [1] Cirt (talk) 12:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Eleventh Doctor. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. So Why 13:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop replacing the free image with a copyrighted screenshot on Eleventh Doctor. Adding more non-free images, especially when replacing free ones, is not productive. Thank you. — Edokter • Talk • 00:15, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:11doctor.jpg

I have tagged File:11doctor.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 16:49, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Girls Aloud image

Hi, I have removed and deleted this image as it fails #1 of our fair-use policy in that it can clearly be replaced by a free image. Arguments that it is a better or more recent image simply won't do. Cheers. Rodhull andemu 22:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to The Eleventh Hour (Doctor Who). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. magnius (talk) 17:28, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Lego_potter_quidditch.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lego_potter_quidditch.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 17:02, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Matt-Smith-Regeneration-2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Matt-Smith-Regeneration-2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ╟─Treasury Tag►duumvirate─╢ 16:04, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Confidential logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Confidential logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:12, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ╟─Treasury Tag►presiding officer─╢ 11:34, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free images

I would suggest (a) that you read our policy on non-free images before uploading any more non-free images, (b) that you ensure that all images are correctly attributed, and (c) that you post at the non-free media talk page if you are unsure. Otherwise, with your history of causing problems with non-free uploads, you may find yourself blocked from editing. Thanks, Black Kite 11:48, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re. your comment here – if you don't know, and you've been warned around 30 times, then what a normal person would do is ask. I'll try to explain now.

Wikipedia is a free-content project, so it likes to avoid using copyrighted material wherever possible. However, there are obviously cases where there is no choice, such as including companies' logos in their articles.

The screenshot currently on the page for The Eleventh Hour shows the Doctor in conversation with the Atraxi. This is something which (a) very much helps readers identify that this is the episode they're interested in, it being one of the most distinctive visual cues of the piece, and (b) cannot be easily replaced by free content: how would you adequately describe the Atraxi's appearance without using a picture of them?

However, the screenshot you uploaded simply showed the Doctor and Amy in the TARDIS. This doesn't help the reader much – it's not interesting and doesn't represent the episode in any meaningful way, and it can be described with words alone: "The Doctor and Amy standing in the TARDIS." We already have a free image of those two, so people anyway know what they look like.

The other problems with your image-related activities are that you don't tag your images appropriately, and you refuse (or have, up 'til now) to engage in discussion about it.

Please reply to confirm that you've read and understood this. ╟─Treasury Tag►Tellers' wands─╢ 17:12, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, sure thing. and deepest apologies, I've been on this site for a fair few years but am still stupid when it comes to this sort of thing - I don't even know if I'm replying to this correctly. anyway thanks for the help.Shokuwarrior (talk • contribs) 18:25, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Matt-Smith-Regeneration-2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Matt-Smith-Regeneration-2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NW (Talk) 16:35, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Matt-Smith-Regeneration-2.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Matt-Smith-Regeneration-2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 20:44, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Matt-Smith-Regeneration-2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Matt-Smith-Regeneration-2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:34, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Doctor Who - Flesh And Stone.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Doctor Who - Flesh And Stone.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ╟─Treasury Tag►consulate─╢ 08:26, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shokuwarrior, you were warned about this before – why are you still uploading improper images? ╟─Treasury Tag►hemicycle─╢ 08:26, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - we've already had this conversation. Shokuwarrior, I suggest that before you upload any more copyrighted images, you ask someone who is familiar with the Wikipedia policies - either Treasury Tag, myself, or any of the editors that post regularly at WT:NFC. At the moment, you're just creating work for other people, which isn't fair on them. Black Kite (t) (c) 06:06, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gladiators UK (The Legends Strike Back)

The article Gladiators UK (The Legends Strike Back) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:EPISODE, no evidence of WP:GNG one of the merge candidates was deleted for same rationale

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret ^account 15:28, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lego potter cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lego potter cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Shokuwarrior. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use of File:Lego potter hogsmeade.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Lego potter hogsmeade.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 21:51, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]