User talk:Shirik/Archives/2015/December
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Shirik. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Block evasion
Ahoy. Here's the offending user from 4K_resolution whom you said you wanted to block at Verizon: 75.162.203.43 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 75.162.205.14 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). And I know that you'd had some other IP addresses of block evasion, including the IPv6 one. I reverted the block evasion activity on the Talk page. — Smuckola(talk) 09:14, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
NOT block evasion!
THOSE BLOCKS ENDED A LONG TIME AGO! Smuck, you really need to pay attention to blocked users before you just assume the person is still blocked! Also, Shirik, you need to remove all block templates that are still on any of those user talk pages. 75.162.203.147 (talk) 12:35, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Whoops!
Hi, Shirik. I got a reversion ping and saw your edit summary - that was my bad; sorry man. I saw that he called you a "smuck" and didn't realize that there was already a discussion going on that put it into context. I'll accept my ten lashings - just let me know when you want me to serve my sentence ;-) -- cheers ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 20:35, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
- (Originally posted several hours ago, then erased by an admin, then reposted by me without editing the original section name:)
- I did not call Shirik a "smuck." There isn't even such a word as I'm aware of. I was referring to the user name of and talking to the person who made that inappropriate posting about me to him. 75.162.203.147 (talk) 21:47, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
- (Then, while she or he couldn't see my previous posting of this while I couldn't repost it without evading the block until being unblocked, obviously, Oshwah said the following:) 75.162.203.147 (talk) 07:09, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Striking out part of my message, as I realize now that he was actually referring to Smuckola. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 22:24, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, Osh Kosh B'gosh, for that update. It seems that that's more semi-apology than I would get from most, if any, other editors. I appreciate that. 75.162.203.147 (talk) 07:19, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- I do owe you an apology. I am sorry for my mistake, 75.162.203.147. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:02, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, Osh Kosh B'gosh, for that update. It seems that that's more semi-apology than I would get from most, if any, other editors. I appreciate that. 75.162.203.147 (talk) 07:19, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Striking out part of my message, as I realize now that he was actually referring to Smuckola. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 22:24, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, User:Oshwah. Have a nice Christmas! (Still the same guy, but I'm 75.162.254.34 (talk) now.) —Preceding undated comment added 16:16, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
A beer for you!
|
Merry Christmas, Shirik! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:36, 25 December 2015 (UTC) |