User talk:Scott5306

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Creve Coeur, Missouri, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. FCSundae ∨^☃ (talk) 05:20, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

The recent edit you made to Creve Coeur, Missouri constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs} 06:25, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Creve Coeur, Missouri. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs} 06:27, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Creve Coeur, Missouri. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs} 06:29, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:15, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Feces bandit

A tag has been placed on Feces bandit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wildthing61476 (talk) 18:00, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Feces bandit

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Feces bandit, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable person, doesn't meet WP:BLP1E. CSD removed by IP

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Wildthing61476 (talk) 18:29, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scott5306 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Wildthing61476 (talk) 18:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Feces bandit

I have nominated Feces bandit, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feces bandit. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Wildthing61476 (talk) 18:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Feces bandit. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. A few things, one he's not-notable, at least in the terms of WP:N. Also, do not remove tags from articles that you crated. Let the process decide whether this article stays or not. Wildthing61476 (talk) 18:46, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 03:14, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]