User talk:Sandro-gi

Welcome!

Hello, Sandro-gi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Verihioni, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Benboy00 (talk) 22:48, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Verihioni

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Verihioni requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Benboy00 (talk) 22:48, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Feast of the Gods (Epic Poem)

The article Feast of the Gods (Epic Poem) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Self published poem by author with same name as article creator. Lacks notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:03, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think that lack of Notability is a ground for the deletion of the page as long as the information for the encyclopedia have to be informative. if something is known that does not need to be pun into the Encyclopedia. If president's children are given in the Wiki even though they are not notable, the information regarding the published poem should be in here. Moreover, how should be measured the notability. if there are any criteria it must be published.

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Sandro-gi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Feast of the Gods (Epic Poem), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 10:19, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COI must be considered in accordance of the content, not taking into the account only the formality. In this term, no Russian must post or edit information regarding the Russia, or the Germans regarding the subjects those are the national pride or else. —Sandro-gi 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Feast of the Gods (Epic Poem) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Feast of the Gods (Epic Poem) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feast of the Gods (Epic Poem) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 10:46, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

A look at your edit history shows that your sole goal here has been to create articles relating to the same author. I saw in your edit history that you tried to create an article in 2017 for a series called "Verihioni". The author's name was slightly different but a little Googling showed evidence that the author is the same as the one who wrote the epic poem that you also wrote about on here. Another person has voiced their suspicion that you have a strong conflict of interest here and I have to agree that it's very likely that you're either the author or someone who knows them - or was hired to write about them. The chances that a person without a COI would create two articles about a self-published author this many years apart are fairly slim. It's possible, but unlikely. Particularly when the author looks to be relatively obscure and you have a username similar to the author's own name. What pushed the block is that you appear to be hiding this conflict of interest, which goes against Wikipedia's policies. One can edit with a conflict of interest, but you must be transparent about it and you absolutely must follow Wikipedia's guidelines on editing and notability. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:24, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sandro-gi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

building encyclopedia must be based on cooperation, not blocking the user. there's no reason blocking me as a user on the ground of that I don't intend to build the encyclopedia just referring the discussion I am answering the "formal revision" of the standards of the Wikipedia. To be blocked by the same administrator who put my article under the instant deletion is THE COI. Expressing such a suspicion: "Another person has voiced their suspicion that you have a strong conflict of interest here and I have to agree that it's very likely that you're either the author or someone who knows them - or was hired to write about them" means that it could be referred to the administrator, he could hire very that ANOTHER PERSON in order to express the suspicion, moreover, that ANOTHER PERSON has no history of editing here. I saw in your edit history that you tried to create an article in 2017 for a series called "Verihioni" -- that is true, but it was only experiment how it would be looked here and no appeal has been expressed by me. I think administrator acts biased and has no intention to help the encyclopedia to be developed, moreover, the administration blocked me after I put his action of deleting my article under the discussion, that speaks itself regarding the intentions of the administrator. Regarding the fact that I have the same name here as the author and published the article with my name and not with a fake username means that I do not intend to veil my identity and my intentions are pure.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 13:18, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You're deflecting and not answering the concerns about you having practically the same name as the author. Here are the facts here that point towards you having a strong conflict of interest and not disclosing it:

You've written two articles about work by the same author, four years apart.
You've had zero other edits other than to insert mention of this author on Wikipedia.
Your username is pretty much identical to the author's name.

To add to this, your response here wasn't to clarify and explain the situation but rather to indirectly accuse me of hiring someone to question whether or not you had a conflict of interest here. Of note is that I do not regularly interact with this editor, twotwofourtysix. That in itself is extremely suspicious and does not reflect well on you as far as an unblock goes. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:11, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"to indirectly accuse me of hiring" -- the administrator expressed the opinion that I might hired someone to publish the article, my comment was the answer to the administrator. anyway, I could create a myriad of accounts to support me and no one from the squad of administrators could detect that (｡◕‿◕｡) and I will do that, see you in five years.

Actually... WP:SPI is set up specifically to detect that sort of situation. Thanks for letting us know ahead of time. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:41, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Actually... welcome, let's see, I like such experiments. (｡◕‿◕｡)
I suppose we will. Blocking talk page access, so any further unblock requests will need to go through the ticket system. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:10, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

+ legal threat on ticket:2021061810005911 Cabayi (talk) 19:24, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabayi: Does that involve me any? Also, can admins access Znuny like we could OTRS? ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 20:25, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, not you. I think that's as much as the NDAs will allow me to say.

OTRS dropped their community edition. Znuny is a fork. Our implementation is now VRT (volunteer response team) in case we need to jump software forks again. WP:VRT explains. Cabayi (talk) 20:57, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Cabayi! It's all I needed to know! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 21:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]