User talk:Samuelrushcondon

Samuelrushcondon, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Samuelrushcondon! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Dathus (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:07, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Gday, what's up. Saw the email, I asked the guys at the gallery if they could setup a page for me on wiki as I'd been in a tonne of art exhibitions and peeps were wondering more about me. I just added in my cv boys and bobs. It's all legit and all them references are straight up real. There's no conflict Ai cause I just putting up the facts for people to know bout me that's all. Why's wanna delete the page? I ain't done nothin to sonny boy over there, I just working and Mindin my business tryna make a dolla, pay for the subway == Your user name and conflict of interest ==

Please see WP:IMPERSONATE. Your user name and your edits to the Samuel Rush Condon article appear to imply that you are the subject of that article. If you are indeed this Samuel Rush Condon then you have a conflict of interest and should not edit this article, see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. If your name is Samuel Rush Condon but you are not this Samuel Rush Condon then please put a statement on your user page state to clearly state this. Otherwise, please change your user name and do not use this account in any way that could be construed as misleading.

Are you the same person as User:Mentalkingaboutthings, who has also contributed to Samuel Rush Condon and has posted related images to Commons?[1] If so, please see WP:Multiple accounts. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:58, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Samuel Rush Condon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samuel Rush Condon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Rush Condon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Verbcatcher (talk) 15:12, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:35, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]