User talk:Soh.Miero

Hi, I'm pretty sure that it is a reliable source. If you think it isn't, please discuss on the article talk page. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 22:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it is a reliable source from the United States government.67.53.214.86 (talk) 01:46, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated references for 29 July 2014 and 22 December 2015 by removing three references for lack of support. The other references fully support the statements.
The writeup for the Swiss entry has been clarified. I fully agree with the addition of the Swiss list of sanctions. On several different days, I have searched the Swiss law for the list, but have not found the correct list. However, for now, these are the best references that I have found. Of course, I could add RT articles, but the RT articles are not specific about which companies are sanctioned.
I corrected the url for the EU sanctions on 31 July 2014. This reference clearly states VTB Bank.
- Thank you for your discussion.67.53.214.86 (talk) 03:31, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

- TNT^❤ 19:14, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Soh.Miero (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21000 was submitted on Mar 24, 2018 20:00:47. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 20:00, 24 March 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Soh.Miero (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21002 was submitted on Mar 24, 2018 22:08:15. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:08, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Soh.Miero (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My accounts Soh.Miero (talk · contribs) and Doomukoh (talk · contribs) were globally and checkuser blocked by There'sNoTime (talk · contribs · logs) on 2018-03-24 21:14 (UTC+2). The reason for this block was purported by There'sNoTime to be that CheckUser evidence strongly ties me to LTA "A Den Jentyl Ettien Avel Dysklyver" which I'm not. I find it hard to see that there is any basis to the allegation from what I know of the CheckUser extension: # IP Information: The chances that my IP information gave even the slightest indication that I am Dysklyver is astronomically low. Internet participation from the country where I reside is rather low, and my ISP uses region and access-type specific ranges. If this did match, I would say there was maybe some basis for the blocks - but since I'm not Dysklyver I'm confident that it did not. # Browser Information: I use Chrome on Linux to edit wikipedia - but really, allot of people do. Wikipedia analytics show that 0.19 % of desktop users use Chrome on Linux, and for overall users this is about 0.11%. Wikipedia stats show there is more than 400,000 editors active each month on wikipedia-en. So there should be about 400 editors using Chrome on Linux to edit wikipedia-en. While this is a small group, not all of these people can be Dysklyver. # User Information: I had two users but Doomukoh (talk · contribs) never made any edits, neither of them had any links with Dysklyver and they were not used inappropriately. So the only potential data point from CheckUser is my browser and OS combination - which is a rather poor data point at that. What was not disclosed to me but what I have discerned through looking at the SPI case history for Dysklyver is that that the reasons for my suspicion likely are: # I was relatively new on IRC # I use "odd" usernames/nicknames/handles # I use Chrome on Linux While this is maybe better basis than just using Chrome on Linux, and while this probably narrows down the 400 editors somewhat I still think blocking everybody based on this criteria makes little sense. It will end up creating allot of collateral. I request that you remove the incorrect blocks as soon as possible. Soh.Miero (talk) 19:21, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Appears to be unblocked SQL ^{Query me!} 21:22, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

Hi Soh.Miero, I've been told your ArbCom appeal was successful and can see you have been unblocked. I'd like to offer my sincere apologies for my mistake, and the significant inconvenience it has caused you - I believed at the time I was acting in the best interest of the project, however I was clearly incorrect in my conclusions. Thank you for your civil candour in the discussions immediately after the block. Moving forward, I will ensure that I seek further opinions in similar situations to ensure this does not happen again. Again, I'm sorry, and if there is anything I can do to assist you, or to make amends, please do not hesitate to contact me - TNT^❤ 20:10, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]