User talk:Salmankhan2255

I am Salman Khan

Welcome!

Hello, Salmankhan2255, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your (future) contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia or the Tutorial
Create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
How to add those all-important references
Simplified style guide

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, If you need help visit the Teahouse or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! David notMD (talk) 15:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Refs not enough

References that confirm he is a movie producer are not enough to confirm Wikipedia notability. What is needed are refs to published content about him. This is difficult to find for producer, because producers are rarely written about in detail compared to the movies, the stars, and even the directors. David notMD (talk) 00:04, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kannan Satheesan (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Akevsharma were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kannan Satheesan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 02:53, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello Salmankhan2255. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Kannan Satheesan, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Salmankhan2255. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Salmankhan2255|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Akevsharma (talk) 03:08, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Simply put, if no paid or personal connection, state that here. If either paid or personal, state that on your User page. David notMD (talk) 10:04, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Either way, if you cannot find refs that are about him at length, not just name mention, consider deleting the draft. To do this, put Db-author at the top, inside curly brackets {{ }}. David notMD (talk) 10:04, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023 - images

You added images to five articles on 8 March. Four are described as your own work. Are you claiming that you took these photographs yourself? David notMD (talk) 12:38, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All images removed for copyright violation. A guess here is that you made these additions with a false claim to being your own work so as to have more than 10 edits and thus be able to create Coolabee without going through AfC. David notMD (talk) 11:32, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Indhu V S, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Salmankhan2255, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Salmankhan2255|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 2A01:4C8:49:B2A2:D8D9:97FF:FE57:E2CC (talk) 19:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Coolabee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coolabee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coolabee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 09:08, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Coolabee - paid?

Hello Salmankhan2255. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made creating Coolabee, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Thus, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Salmankhan2255. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Salmankhan2255|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. David notMD (talk) 11:28, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not a paid article Salmankhan2255 (talk) 13:42, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doubted, given that you - a new account - decided to by-pass AfC to create an article about a two-month old company. David notMD (talk) 18:19, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anoop Mohan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Anoop Mohan, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz💬 18:50, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editing while logged out

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Draft:Anoop Mohan while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. 2A01:4C8:49:B2A2:4417:4CFF:FE0A:E479 (talk) 19:49, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Indhu V S

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Indhu V S, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2A01:4C8:49:B2A2:D8D9:97FF:FE57:E2CC (talk) 19:10, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anoop Mohan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Anoop Mohan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:11, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:SuhailShaji786 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SuhailShaji786. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Mz7 (talk) 04:20, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]