User talk:Salimfadhley/Archives/2021/October

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Salimfadhley. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geza Tarjanyi has been accepted

Geza Tarjanyi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 03:37, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geza Tarjanyi (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FormalDude was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Geza Tarjanyi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Geza Tarjanyi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

––FormalDude talk 17:26, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Salimfadhley! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ––FormalDude talk 17:26, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Salimfadhley was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Salimfadhley/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Salimfadhley/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Salimfadhley (talk) 09:16, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Rejection of the Artificial Intelligence for Environment & Sustainability page

Dear Salimfadhley,

Thanks a lot for your comment. I have edited the article following your instructions and added relevant sources (from UN, government links, IPBES, IUCN, etc.) Besides this, please note that the ARIES Project is also mentioned in the following Wikipedia pages:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecosystem_service https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecosystem_valuation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_of_Integrated_Environmental_and_Economic_Accounting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_capital https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_capital_accounting

Hope the article is good to be published now. Best, aoescalaAoescala (talk) 16:09, 11 October 2021 (UTC).

request

I seem to be going too fast and making errors. I going to take a short break from reviewing articles. I'd be grateful i you didn't ask me questions for a while, because I seem to have gotten some of the answers wrong. . DGG ( talk ) 19:23, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Understood, and thank you. --Salimfadhley (talk) 21:47, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Nakheel Properties notability

See Draft:Nakheel Properties and especially Nakheel Properties notability above. A response would be welcome. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 18:09, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

I did reply! Please look again. Salimfadhley (talk) 14:44, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Teahouse Host - a belated welcome

Dear Salimfadhley,

Thank you for volunteering as a Host at the Teahouse. Wikipedia is a community of people working together to make knowledge free. You are an important part of that effort! By joining as a Host, and by following our expectations, you are helping new users to get started here at Wikipedia, and aiding more experienced users who just have a question about how something works. We appreciate your willingness to help!

Here are some links you may find helpful as a Host:

Useful scripts you can install to make responding easier,
templates to use and, of course:
the question forum itself.

Editors who have signed up as hosts, but who have not contributed at the Teahouse for six months or so may be removed from the list of hosts.

Cheers, Nick Moyes (talk) 14:22, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Regarding Bassim Haidar page submission

Hello SalimFadhley, first of all many thanks for taking the time to review the Bassim Haidar article - your time dedicated and your comments are always appreciated. Regarding improvement over the previous version, you are right, I only added two references. Reason is that the previous reviewer, TheBirdsShedTears, suggested that to establish notability there should be 3 sources that cover the WP:GNG description in a length of about 100 words, and out of my proposed existing references only acknowledged one of them as well-established and/or not paywalled, the Amnesty International article (reference 34 in the original article). This discussion is well documented in the reviewer's talk page, found at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TheBirdsShedTears#Regarding_Bassim_Haidar_page_submission. So I only added two more references, nos. 8 and 11, from well-established news outlets (both The Guardian Nigeria and Kathimerini from Greece have their own Wikipedia pages as independent and well-established newspapers), as I presumed this would suffice. So, it would be immensely appreciated if you could please kindly advise what further improvements are needed for the article to move forward, as I have to admit I am quite stumbled over this. Thank you once again both for your time so far, and in advance for your assistance. Best, StefPap73 (talk) 10:48, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Can you identify three sources that show that this subject meets our notability standard? I want your best three links, but no more than 3. --Salimfadhley (talk) 11:34, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Many thanks for your reply Salim, these would be the Amnesty International appointment article which has already been accepted by the previous reviewer, Sionk (https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2016/01/amnesty-appoints-telecommunications-entrepreneur-bassim-haidar-to-its-global-council/), the Kathimerini Greek newspaper article on Mr. Haidar which unfortunately is in Greek but can easily be understood via Google Translate or anything similar (https://www.kathimerini.gr/society/976145/mpasim-chaintar-i-krisi-ekane-tin-ellada-kali-agora-gia-mikrodaneia/), and the Nigerian newspaper The Guardian article on the Nigerian Communications Committee Chairman meeting Mr. Haidar and commenting on his business efforts (https://guardian.ng/business-services/ncc-chairman-applauds-channel-vas-founder-for-companys-growth/). There are others but, as you asked, providing the 3 which are the best fit for the WP:GNG. Again, many thanks for taking the time and effort to support. Hope these suffice, I remain at your disposal for anything further. All the best, StefPap73 StefPap73 (talk) 07:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello Salim, hope all is well. A kind check on your comments regarding the above. Thank you in advance. StefPap73 (talk) 14:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Added Sources to Article "Marcia Hermansen"

Hi, I've added five new secondary sources to "Marcia Hermansen" from news articles, two books, and an academic journal. I think it should be better now. Thanks --Zaynab1418 (talk) 23:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021 backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| November 2021 Backlog Drive
On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. (t · c) buidhe 01:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Adding back some admin deleted text mood ring article

Greetings Sakimfadhley. So I see a chunk of text was removed from the article. Some "babies" got thrown out with the bath water (if ur familiar with that term). How do I (or someone) add back some of the most appropriate info re the iconic original mood ring history? Thx! Moodman001 (talk) 04:05, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

You can almost always view old versions of an article via the "view history" link at the top of the page. That should allow you to recover old content. Salimfadhley (talk) 09:24, 28 October 2021 (UTC)