User talk:SIR FRANCIS CORNWALL

This is SIR FRANCIS CORNWALL's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

It appears that your submission is either an attempt to be humorous rather than factual, or is an obvious hoax. As Wikipedia strives to contain only factual entries, we can not accept your submission at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SIR FRANCIS CORNWALL/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 12:29, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! SIR FRANCIS CORNWALL, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 12:29, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:44, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see WP:NOTWEBHOST. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:45, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Orange Mike | Talk 01:02, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SIR FRANCIS CORNWALL (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

MY PAGE DIDN'T TALK ABOUT A CONTINGENCY CV BUT IT MEANT TO EXPLAIN THE WHOLE AS A PERSONNAGE, THAT IS TO SAY ME, AS A WHOLE IN AN ETENRITY CONCEPT, BECAUSE I HAVE SEEN THAT ALL PEOPLE TELL ABOUT THEIR LIVES, SHOULD A PERSON BE FAMOUS OR ARE WE ALL PRESENT IN THIS WIKIPEDIA ENCYCLOPAEDIA?

Decline reason:

Wikipedia hosts articles about people only when they satisfy the notability requirements described at WP:N, and is not a forum for writing about ourselves or expounding our own ideas about eternity etc. So no, we are very much not "all present in this Wikipedia encyclopedia". Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:07, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of File:Sir Francis Cornwall.jpg

The file File:Sir Francis Cornwall.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 02:56, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]