User talk:SHAH1975

Speedy deletion nomination of Xcelerate

Hello SHAH1975,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Xcelerate for deletion, because it seems to be an promotion, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, heather walls (talk) 09:31, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello SHAH1975 and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! —SMALL JIM 10:10, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, SHAH1975. You have new messages at Smalljim's talk page.
Message added 10:32, 17 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—SMALL JIM 10:32, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Xcelerate

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Xcelerate, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TheLongTone (talk) 12:10, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:29, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Xcelerate

Hello SHAH1975,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Xcelerate for deletion, because it seems to be an promotion, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, heather walls (talk) 05:43, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:35, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SHAH1975 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i should be unblocked because my contribution is not for advetisement purpose.I m just higlighting this new concept of teaching which can be benefical for the childrens who are deprived of getting coaching from experts at their hometown.

Decline reason:

While you are entitled to your opinion, it is our opinion which governs here. Your article has now been classified as promotional by five different editors, including three admins. An unblock is possible, but only after we a certain that you fully understand the reason for your block. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:56, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

By "higlighting" (sic) you mean telling the world how wonderful and beneficial it is, that is to say promoting it. No matter how good a cause something is, Wikipedia does not exist for the purpose of spreading the good word about it and encouraging people to believe it is a good cause. That is to say, Wikipedia does not exist to promote anything. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:53, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]