User talk:Ryanmasu11

Hello,

I am writing in regards to the clean up tag in hopes of elucidating the necessary changes to ensure that my article conforms to all necessary Wiki policy and procedures. Thank you for reading through the article making certain it does not deviate.

Hello, Ryanmasu11. You have new messages at Ryanmasu11's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi Ryan, I see you have recreated the article, I'll leave it temporarily to give you a chance to clean up. My concerns:

The article was created in virtually a single edit, without wikilinks and with the references in "paper", rather than wikipedia style. It looks like an article that has been published somewhere and just copied onto Wikipedia. Unless the original was published with an explicit PD or CC-BY-SA 3.0 licence, it cannot be used here, because it is a copyright infringement. I haven't searched for the source yet because the bots are better at finding infringements than me.

Although it has references, they lack transparency. There is accessible stuff, a quick Google found this and others in a couple of minutes. There are lots of technical terms that need wikilinks, and you need to put in some work to make the style more suitable for a general encyclopaedia. The article is completely uncritical; I appreciate that you are hardly likely to criticise Erchonia, but for balance you should report any adverse comments. example

Note that imperial units are not understood by most of the world outside NAm, you should give metric conversions Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:57, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ryanmasu11. You have new messages at Crosstemplejay's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

References

If you look at ref 1, you will see that using [url title] in the ref instead of separate title and url gives a much more readable ref, with a link from the title instead of a bare url Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:37, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zerona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zerona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zerona until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Delta13C (talk) 06:24, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]