User talk:Rreisman
Hello, Rreisman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
- Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- Simplified Ruleset
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Wikipedia Glossary
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.
Happy editing!
-- Sango123 (talk) 22:15, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)
Coactive TV has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this is more of an advertisement than an encyclopedia article. Please review WP:SPAM for some things that give people that impression. Also review WP:NEO for why this term, if not yet in widespread use, might not be appropriate for an article. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so. For instance, you might also consider making this term a redirect to another article which covers these points without concentrating on this particular term.
If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the prod notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. NickelShoe 17:13, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Personally, I would suggest you merge all the relevant material (from the other articles too) into Media multitasking. NickelShoe 17:16, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
--I have attempted to remedy these issues generally along the lines suggested, and propose that the article remain in place in its now-shortened form. The external link has been removed (but I am considering adding it back along with at least 3-4 other links to enahnced TV two-screen services and phone based services, as sufficient to address the SEO abuse concern). I suggest that the entry for "coactive tv" adds value, and has gotten industry recognition as an important concept, such as in the NAB's authoritative book on ITV. (Since this professional book is not widely distributed, some quotes can be seen at [NAB book excerpts].) Rreisman 16:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Coactive TV
[edit]
I have nominated Coactive TV, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coactive TV. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ThaddeusB (talk) 19:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Pay what you want -- edits
[edit]I did a significant expansion of this page just earlier, by copying into my sandbox, then copying back, to minimize any risk to the live page -- sorry if this may have confused the change tracking. (I don't know if this is commenting in the right place--added this after saving changes)
My intent was to remove none of the prior content, simply to add, and do minor mods/corrections related to that. Citations are included wherever necessary I think (except for material already in referenced related pages, and presumably adequately cited there). Please let me know if any issues.