User talk:Rekonstruh

Vandalism

I just undid your edit here, what is the point? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Orahovac&oldid=405906383

thanks James Michael DuPont (talk) 18:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

and again,http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kosovska_Mitrovica&curid=283905&diff=406105317&oldid=404495693 you are going to get in trouble. see WP:POVPUSH James Michael DuPont (talk) 22:35, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

and here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pristina&curid=15839892&diff=406105195&oldid=405461065 22:37, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

and here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pe%C4%87&oldid=406104727 James Michael DuPont (talk) 22:37, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

and here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Velika_Ho%C4%8Da&oldid=406104559 James Michael DuPont (talk) 22:37, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. James Michael DuPont (talk) 22:40, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Formation dates

You need to start discussing your edits regarding the formation dates of Serbia. Wikipedia is not your own personal website, if others disagree with one of your edits you must engage in an civilized discussion and provide reasoning as to why it should or should not be kept. If you can’t play by the rules, don't play the game. Buttons (talk) 01:33, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For Christ's sake. [1] You were nicely told several times to bring the issue of events to the talk page. I don't care either way, but just coming to the article every day and changing it to the way you like, without a shred of edit summary, is obnoxious. Your actions constitute edit warring; please read that page. Thanks. No such user (talk) 07:26, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You don't get it. Among other pillars Wikipedia operates by consensus, not by whim of individual editors, otherwise it would descend into chaos. Just because something is true does not mean it must be said in every article. Inclusion of the year of Ottoman conquest in the infobox is disputed, because the infobox lists "establishment" events, and loss of independence is not an "establishment". Like I said, I don't particularly care if it's included or not, but I'm quite unhappy with your attitude: the prototypical cycle is bold, revert, discuss, and you don't seem to ever discuss. No such user (talk) 10:38, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:07, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Stop adding unreferenced claims to, and removing referenced information from the article Serbs, as you have repeatedly done here, here, and here. Your personal opinion on the subject is of absolutely no value for the encyclopedic content. If you repeat the disruptive edits, you may be blocked from editing wikipedia. Vladimir (talk) 17:29, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]