User talk:Carmen at RSH

Hello, Regency3900. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. 2601:188:0:ABE6:D538:9C0E:BF78:37A3 (talk) 19:54, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 2601:188:0:ABE6:D538:9C0E:BF78:37A3. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. 2601:188:0:ABE6:D538:9C0E:BF78:37A3 (talk) 19:54, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:188:0:ABE6:D538:9C0E:BF78:37A3 (talk) 01:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, if you continue to use Wikipedia as a promotional vehicle, I'll request administrative action, in the form of an account block or page protection. Thank you, 2601:188:0:ABE6:D538:9C0E:BF78:37A3 (talk) 01:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add that in reverting the article to an unacceptable version, you restored a copyright violation, as was explained in a previous edit summary. Copyright violations are treated seriously on Wikipedia, and accounts may be blocked for posting them. 2601:188:0:ABE6:D538:9C0E:BF78:37A3 (talk) 01:07, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because this account has been used only for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to Wikipedia's content policy. Also, your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is against Wikipedia's policy: an account is for an individual, not a group. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free advertising service.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of this page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:41, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]