User talk:Reaper X/Archive 4

This Suffering

There is proof that this is the fifth single cuz there is a video for it and it was supposivly announced on MOD.
DO NOT delete This Suffering. --Crocodileman 16:17, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning edits to St. Thomas, Ontario

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Godsmack

Hi, would you please talk some sense into User:Demantos. He is trying to merge Godsmack discography with Godsmack. Godsmack has enough music to warrent a seperate article for discography, and any substantially successful band has one on wikipedia. Please comment on his talk page, and comment here.

Thank you,

Skeeker _[Talk] 01:43, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

St Thomas

For your efforts to keep the peace and resisting the temptations to engage in an edit war on st thomas I award each yourself, Deconstructhis and jgale061 a barnstar of peace. May you continue to contribute to wikipedia in the dignified fashion you always do

		The Barnstar of Peace
		For your efforts to keep the peace and resisting the temptations to engage in an edit war on st thomas I award each yourself, Deconstructhis and jgale061 a barnstar of peace. May you continue to contribute to wikipedia in the dignified fashion you always do

Ottawa4ever (talk) 22:31, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hey there Reaper! I've been perusing your contributions and such, and I have definitely seen you around here, and am looking to vote at your Rfa, but, as some other editors have said, I find myself confused by the statement "My next task is becoming an admin, so I can have my hand further in the cookie jar" on your userpage. I'm holding off my vote, hopefully looking for an answer from ya! Just a just curious what that's all about; perhaps an inside joke or such. :) Jmlk 1 7 00:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the answer and the quick reply! :) Jmlk 1 7 05:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note of encouragement

Hey there - I am sorry to see you withdrew your RfA (I was on my way to comment). I was a bit bewildered by most of the opposes, but such is life. If you'd like to give it a while (maybe 90 days) I would be happy to nominate you in the future. --Spike Wilbury ♫ talk 21:21, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==Pedophilia and Child Sexual Abuse in Fiction==

Thanks for your response to the request for comment on the Pedophilia and Child Sexual Abuse in Fiction page. Its principal author appears to agree that it could be replaced with a simple list, under a less POV title and introduction. To that end, I have put a proposed version up on a sandbox at my Wikipedia user page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SocJan/Sandbox Your comments would be very welcome. SocJan (talk) 03:20, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

U2 Peer Review

Hi, just wanted to let you know that I just nominated U2 for a peer review. Any advice on getting people to look at it? Thanks! Wikipedia brown (talk) 01:58, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! The peer review for U2 was going nowhere fast, so I nominated the article for FA candidacy. You were supportive of this (and I hope you still are!). If so, may I ask that you provide your support at Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/U2? Many thanks. Wikipedia brown (talk) 05:35, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

music samples

is there a page that describes how to add music samples? -- ZookPS3 (talk) 19:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Informing past contributors of new TFD for Template:Maintained

As you were a contributor in the last TFD, I am letting you know that {{Maintained}} is again up for deletion. Please review the current version of the template and discuss it at the TFD. Thanks! — BRIAN0918 • 2008-01-30 17:48Z

CNR Radio

Thanks, I've just dropped bearcat a line. Reggie Perrin (talk) 22:43, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks so much for the barnstar! It makes it all worthwhile! Drewcifer (talk) 19:06, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Long

People think that if an article has LONG tagged on it, it will put reviewers off, but they don't know that it will ATTRACT more reviewers, precisely because it is LONG. Why? Because there are more MISTAKES in it! There is no feeling more comforting (as someone once said) than criticising other people's work. It's what Wikipedia is for, after all... (Wot, me being negative? Absolutely not, dear chap... :) --andreasegde (talk) 17:56, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zeitgeist

My main suggestion is to focus on the reviews by the most noteworthy media: Time, The New York Times, Rolling Stone, NME, Allmusic, Spin, and the like. It's not as big a problem as it is with In Rainbows, but when it comes to reviews you always want to focus on the top voices available, and then get into less-notable reviewers if you have to. WesleyDodds (talk) 05:14, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wipers - The Herd.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wipers - The Herd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Collaboration

From looking at the Rage Against the Machine talk page, I can see that you're a prolific contributor. For that reason, I'd like to get your help if possible. The Rage Against the Machine discography is currently undergoing a complete rewrite by me at User:Seegoon/Dirtbox. I need particular assistance with the music videos; for instance, a discography shouldn't really describe what goes on in the video, but notable events external to it should be listed in the notes column. I need to move all of the description of the videos in the current version of the discography into the article for the single, in order to clean up. If you want to edit the page, that'd be super, but even if you just want to leave a couple of comments, that'll do too. All in all, thanks for your time. Seegoon (talk) 13:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

omg i know u, ur in my history class, lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.242.202.172 (talk) 23:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

danzig band page

someone has written obi Wan Kenobi is a member of the band —Preceding unsigned comment added by AJReaper (talk • contribs) 00:01, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

how you edit at the top of pages

as i can only seem to edit parts from the middle on ward —Preceding unsigned comment added by AJReaper (talk • contribs) 10:05, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cipher system and by night split.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cipher system and by night split.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:18, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Resolution near (?) on how to entitle Tony Sandel's lists of books portraying sexual attraction to children

Please visit Talk:List_of_works_portraying_adult_attraction_to_young_males#Requested_move. Tony has accepted a proposal for a new title that may put to rest objections dating back to late 2006. Your input in the next few days would be appreciated. You participated in earlier discussions of this question and related questions about that work. SocJan (talk) 03:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

annoying vandal

That "AFI-punk" (79.211...) guy who some admin told we should ignore at the discussion board for the Billy Talent page is constantly changing the genres on the front page.. He has removed punk rock this time. Can't you just ban him? It's getting annoying, and he seems to have crossed some banlimit already.. ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.212.104.61 (talk) 00:59, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I've been warning him for months and reporting him to WP:AIV. Obviously this situation is a lot easier now that I have admin tools myself. For the last few days, each day that he vandalises, I've given him a final warning and if he ignores that, I've blocked. However, I left him a message on one of the ips he was active on, telling him that it was his final warning. He's been given enough blocks to know that what he's doing is wrong, so from now on if I see him vandalising, it's an immediate 24 hour block.

Because he's operating from dynamic ip addresses (they change daily), we can't block him for a longer period than that. So in this situation it's best to deny recognition and revert, block, ignore. He'll get bored eventually. Seraphim♥ ^Whipp 14:22, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so we're talking about a retard --80.212.104.61 (talk) 22:45, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dangerous Toys self-titled.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dangerous Toys self-titled.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:11, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AVSS viking heads.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:AVSS viking heads.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:52, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

School logo

Hi there. I was curious if you could help me with the copyright status of Image:AVSS viking heads.JPG. This image is a symbol of Arthur Voaden Secondary School, a TVDSB secondary school in St. Thomas, Ontario Canada. I have the suspicion that it may not be full-out copyrighted, or there may be no copyright at all. Could you determine this in any way? Please post a reply on my talk page. Thanks. -- Reaper X 22:41, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not aware of any reason to believe they would not be fully copyrighted. Do you know when the logo was created? --Rat at WikiFur (talk) 05:29, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NIN Stuff

Hey man, so good work so far on With Teeth. I'll try and find some time soon to help out with that article. In the meantime, I was hoping I could ask you a NIN-related favor. Nine Inch Nails live performances is at FAC right now, and one of the reviewers has asked that the article by copyedited by an "unrelated party." I guess what I means by that is that it needs to be copyedited by anyone but me. So, I was hoping you might be able to take a few minutes and tweak the prose a little bit? If not, no big deal, but that would help me with one of the larger complaints concerning that article. Thanks either way. Drewcifer (talk) 21:05, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it looks like I was mistaken with that. After a bit more researching, it actually was NIN that did the remixes. But I'm not so sure it belongs on the main NIN page, since it doesn't relate to the greater history of NIN all that much. But I suppose it belongs on the template. That's just my own opinion though. Drewcifer (talk) 16:35, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SP Zeitgeist orange.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SP Zeitgeist orange.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SP Zeitgeist purple.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SP Zeitgeist purple.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SP Zeitgeist gray.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SP Zeitgeist gray.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Certifications

Just wanted to let you know that I was semi-stealing/semi-expanding upon Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Certifications at List of music recording sales certifications. Figured it was time that stuff was brought into the main namespace. Just wanted to give you a heads up, in hopes to avoid the thought that I just blatantly copied/stole your idea. Anyways, that's it! Keep up the good work. Drewcifer (talk) 02:47, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Finally finished the certifications list. Take a look and let me know what you think! Also, I've nominated it at WP:FLC, in a large part because of the awesome work you did on the other page before I got to it. Drewcifer (talk) 09:29, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliment! It's not every day one gets an "In-fucking-credible" at Wikipedia! Drewcifer (talk) 06:39, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Help Desk Request

It appears that a help desk request you submitted has been answered. Please take a moment a view the reply over there - if this doesn't quite help you, please feel free to ask for more information or clarification. Tiggerjay (talk) 22:30, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops, I used the wrong template. :) Check out your entry over at WP:COIN... Tiggerjay (talk) 04:32, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Uw-lyrics

Template:Uw-lyrics has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 22:32, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]