User talk:Rduggira/sandbox

This is great - I have nothing to add beyond the terrific reviewer comments below. --Amille75 (talk) 05:39, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great articles! I feel like I learned a lot about your topic that was diverse and far reaching, which I liked. I didn't see any grammar mistakes and all scientific names were italicized. One part where I was confused was when you started talking about Brazil and soil content. It might be smart to reword or reorganize the fourth paragraph so that it leads with the species and then starts talking about the Brazilian soil. Overall, I would try to find some information on the food properties of the plant because I know Dr. Miller wanted a definitive focus on their capabilities as food crops. Good work on your article! It was very informative and contained really good information! Mmurph95 (talk) 19:49, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your article was really fascinating! Some things you can improve on:

1. I really liked your article because you told us the exact uses of this plant 2. There were no grammatical errors I found. 3. Something that can be fixed are the citations. I don't think you did them according to the way Dr. Miller likes them. Ex. Moeller AH, Li Y, Ngole EM, Ahuka-Mundeke S, Lonsdorf EV, Puse AE, Peeter M, Hahn BH, Ochman H (2014) Rapid changes in the gut microbiome during human evolution. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences 111(45): 16431 – 16435. 4. Another suggestion is to add subsections so it is easier to read and so the reader knows exactly what you are going to talk about in that section. 5. I enjoyed your article and feel that you have all the right content. Overall, you did a great job with this project! -Sachi Patel