User talk:Rationalcurve
Your submission at Articles for creation: Contraction theorem (March 10)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Contraction theorem and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! Rationalcurve,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — kikichugirl oh hello! 04:18, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
|
Your draft article, Draft:Contraction theorem
[edit]Hello, Rationalcurve. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Contraction theorem".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:47, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Contraction theorem
[edit]I have had your article contraction theorem restored. Editors are supposed to ask the math project for advice before declining articles like this that they do not understand, but unfortunately some do not bother. r.e.b. (talk) 17:55, 28 April 2016 (UTC)