User talk:Rana majali

Integrated Technology Group

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rana majali (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i didn't read the polices

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:07, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will not address this, as I was the blocking administrator, but in passing I will say that it is not enough to simply read the policies: have you understood them? What will you do differently, if unblocked? Vanamonde (talk) 10:59, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are not permitted to blank a prior unblock decline. You may request another unblock, but any further blanking will result in your access to this page being revoked. --Yamla (talk) 15:47, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rana majali (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i did wrong and i apologize for the misleading please be assure that i will not do that again

Decline reason:

Per below. I agree with the withdrawal of your access to this page, as that would be your third content-free appeal. MER-C 10:28, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As the blocking admin, I would recommend that this be declined, and talk page access be revoked: this user has blanked previous warnings/unblock requests multiple times, after being told not to. If they continue to do so, I will do this myself. Vanamonde (talk) 07:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rana majali (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

my account has been hacked

Decline reason:

Duplicate, nonsensical request (given other requests on this page). MER-C 10:28, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Vanamonde (talk) 09:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI to passing admins: I have revoked talk page access because of repeated blanking of previous declined unblock requests, despite repeated instructions to the contrary. Vanamonde (talk) 11:06, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that her block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Rana majali (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17434 was submitted on Feb 01, 2017 06:59:24. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 06:59, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]