User talk:Rahulwiki214

April 2023

Please stop. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Rashid Ali Ghazipuri, you may be blocked from editing. Fram (talk) 14:25, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please try to understand , why you all against  try to delete a general profile , with validity, its bad things

Hello, I'm The Night Watch. I noticed that in this edit to User talk:Fram, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Night Watch (talk) 14:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User:Gazal world. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Night Watch (talk) 14:34, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion. Fram (talk) 14:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Wesoree ^(T·C) 14:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=Dear ScottishFinnishRadish ,

I am deeply sorry for any actions that may have led to my account being blocked on Wikipedia. I understand that my behavior may have violated the community guidelines and caused inconvenience to other users.

I want to assure you that I am committed to following the rules and regulations set forth by the community and will take full responsibility for any past mistakes. I understand the importance of contributing to a respectful and accurate information source such as Wikipedia and would appreciate the opportunity to continue doing so.

Once again, I apologize for any inconvenience I may have caused and sincerely hope that you will consider unblocking my account. Thank you for your time and understanding.

Sincerely,

Rahulwiki214~~~~}}

. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rahulwiki214 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me i am accurate editor but due some editor and moderators are personal interest and against me, so even genuine edit with reference they are blocking and adding the page on deletion.its very bad why people are against a author , he has published many books and authentic poet and author so please unblock me so i can edit and please save from the rude moderators and editors they are harassing me

Decline reason:

First of all, see WP:NOTTHEM. Secondly, this does not address the removal of sections and complete blanking of a user's talk page. Third, you need to address right now the question from Valereee below. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you explain what is happening here? Valereee (talk) 15:27, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to be a remarkable coincidence that just after one editor has been blocked another one removes the same AfD notice. Some people might even think that it is not a coincidence. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are even more coincidences than that. The page was semi'd, and the second editor, who hadn't edited since 2019, was making their eleventh edit. Valereee (talk) 15:45, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Should we open an SPI? I like Astatine (Talk to me) 16:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind, [[1]] I like Astatine (Talk to me) 16:13, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I can literally smell socking and also disruptive editing. I also opened up a case at WP:ANI. -- Wesoree ^(T·C) 16:30, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kartikay Saini for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kartikay Saini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kartikay Saini until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Valereee (talk) 16:34, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NOw who is intensely using wrong power , and affecting others genuine person profile, really its bad, i was thinking Wikipedia is fresh genuine platform but i understand some group of people using wrong power game .... please answer me all

Please fix the issue

Until you drop this blatant legal threat, you WILL NOT be allowed to edit Wikipedia. If you create accounts to get around this block, those account will be blocked on sight as well. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:34, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=Dear ScottishFinnishRadish ,

I am deeply sorry for any actions that may have led to my account being blocked on Wikipedia. I understand that my behavior may have violated the community guidelines and caused inconvenience to other users.

I want to assure you that I am committed to following the rules and regulations set forth by the community and will take full responsibility for any past mistakes. I understand the importance of contributing to a respectful and accurate information source such as Wikipedia and would appreciate the opportunity to continue doing so.

Once again, I apologize for any inconvenience I may have caused and sincerely hope that you will consider unblocking my account. Thank you for your time and understanding.

Sincerely,

Rahulwiki214~~~~}}

. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:25, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Team , please unblock me Rahulwiki214 (talk) 15:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Balvinder Kumar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Balvinder Kumar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balvinder Kumar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Callmemirela 🍁 ^talk 19:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ranveer Singh Saini for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ranveer Singh Saini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranveer Singh Saini until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Callmemirela 🍁 ^talk 19:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Scottish High International School - Gurgaon

Hello, Rahulwiki214. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Scottish High International School - Gurgaon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]