User talk:Rachelharrisla

Rachelharrisla, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rachelharrisla! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:04, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Skye Nicolas (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:PEACOCK. The lead could do with a copyedit to comply with WP:TONE.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Skye Nicolas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 09:01, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Skye Nicolas (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not satisfying the applied notability standards as we best consider museum collections or major art reviews here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Skye Nicolas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:11, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Skye Nicolas has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Skye Nicolas. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 04:46, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Skye Nicolas has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Skye Nicolas. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 21:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Skye Nicolas has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Skye Nicolas. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 21:21, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Skye Nicolas has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Skye Nicolas. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 21:42, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Skye Nicolas has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Skye Nicolas. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 22:14, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Skye Nicolas (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Subject has to pass WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG. Unless you're citing major newspapers you're going to have a hard time proving notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Skye Nicolas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 06:41, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Skye Nicolas (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

The referencing has not been changed since the last time this was rejected; the only edits that have taken place since then were formatting adjustments, not the addition of any new references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Skye Nicolas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Skye Nicolas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 05:24, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Skye Nicolas

Draft:Skye Nicolas, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Skye Nicolas and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Skye Nicolas during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 05:36, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited VST & Co., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]