User talk:Tiedyeina

Sociotype

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sociotype, by Stormbay (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sociotype fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

The importance of this subject matter has not been established. It is material not supported by sources

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sociotype, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Sociotype itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:38, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Prettyian! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 191 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

James Lynch (trumpeter) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:52, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Techready for deletion

The article Techready is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Techready until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Safety Cap (talk) 20:13, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]