User talk:PokkiriPandian

Welcome!

Hello, PokkiriPandian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MeeGhaMan ^(talk) 05:43, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aparachit 2

Why do you feel this dubbed film warrants an article? Editor 2050 (talk) 13:14, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not me who created that article. It's a user called Selvamagan77 who did so. I felt that there can be more data added if the article is purposefully created. That's why I added it.

Okay, the usual policy on dubbing films is that the information should just be added to the original page. Moreover, it looks like Aparachit 2 did not have a theatrical release - it was dubbed and released on video only - and it's unlikely that even the makers/actors of the film know about it's existence. It is certainly not notable enough to have a separate page. Editor 2050 (talk) 13:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so I will not add anymore data about Aparichit 2, friend. What you said is 100% correct. Being a Vikram fan, I watched and loved this film. So, please also mind if anyone recreates this article, do exactly the same what you earlier did. Thanks a lot.

Thank you, too! Enjoy 10 Endrathukulla. Editor 2050 (talk) 13:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, friend! Will see it definitely!

Orphaned non-free image File:Aparichit 2 Movie Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aparichit 2 Movie Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chennai Circuit 2019 Movie Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chennai Circuit 2019 Movie Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.

In this edit you added that Sethupathi became a "Box Office Hit" (italics yours). This is meaningless subjective fluff and constitutes undue weight given to one outlet's opinion. If a film receives a low critical response at Rotten Tomatoes we don't write, "the film was rotten". "Declared hit", "failure", "flop", "super-hit" and "all-time super-blockbuster status" have no place in articles.

In this edit you wrote "The film opened well and became a Box Office success." But the reference you submitted says nothing about "success".

In this edit you changed "it was above average at box office" to "it was a moderate success at the box office", but the existing reference says nothing to support either perspective, which suggests that you're just editorializing.

In this edit you say "The film released on 4 March 2016 to positive reviews". This is a broad statement that describes the entirety of critical response, and is only supported by a single cherrypicked review (which, by the way, gives the film a lukewarm 3/5 stars, making it an exceptionally poor choice if you're trying to say the film received positive reviews). If I were to find two negative reviews and add them as references, would I be able to change the summary to "mostly negative reviews". No, because we shouldn't be summarizing critical response without attributing that summary to a reliable source. That is: a reliable published source has to say "the film received mostly positive reviews". We are not critical response aggregators.

Wikipedia is not a forum for us to express our opinions. It is an objective encyclopedia. Content must be properly sourced, must be written from a neutral point of view and we must take great efforts to avoid promoting subjects through biased language. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:47, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning on AALAVANDHAN

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aalavandhan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. NO NEED TO SUPRESS YOUR OWN VIEWS. WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A BLOG OK! SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 11:57, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Fan (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [1] It would have taken less time to paste a reference than it would to type that edit summary. Genre is subjective, often disputed, and needs to be adequately supported with references. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battlefield Enforcement

The article Battlefield Enforcement has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable upcoming film, does not meet WP:NFF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 17:16, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kattarpanthy

The article Kattarpanthy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film, no secondary independent coverage, does not meet WP:NF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 17:18, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kattarpanthy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kattarpanthy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kattarpanthy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY2008 00:14, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battlefield Enforcement for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battlefield Enforcement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battlefield Enforcement until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY2008 01:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Superheroprashast (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:21, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Battlefield Enforcement Movie Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Battlefield Enforcement Movie Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, PokkiriPandian. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vishwavijay Movie Poster.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vishwavijay Movie Poster.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:37, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]