User talk:PlaystationCup

January 2019

Hello, I'm Velella. I noticed that you recently removed content from Biscuit without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:32, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent and wrong edit changes

Your persistent changes to make articles worse and less grammatically correct is likely to result in your account being blocked. Please do not make changes unless they improve an article. Making articles worse is a recipe for disaster. Can you please explain why you are editing as you are? Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:41, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Fitbit. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:42, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Velella: You are doing exactly the same thing. Pot kettle black. PlaystationCup (talk) 23:44, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, what I am doing is restoring the last good version. You are vandalising the article for no good reason Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:47, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Velella: It's still edit warring you're reverting constantly without discussion. PlaystationCup (talk) 23:48, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fitbit. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:43, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 02:13, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PlaystationCup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for abusing my privileges on Wikipedia, if I am unblocked I will be civil with editors and discuss any disputes rather than edit war. PlaystationCup (talk) 02:24, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Falsifying timestamps won't do anything to earn you an unblock here. Graham87 03:11, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.