User talk:Piyush5767

Explanation of deletion

There are several things you haven't understood. Please follow the links in the points below.

Please read Wikipedia:Golden rule to get a brief overview of what is expected for an article to be retained on Wikipedia.
Your article was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#A7 because it failed to assert any credible claim of significance.
Even if you had asserted a claim of significance to explain why this company merits an article on Wikipedia, it would still have to meet the criteria spelled out in WP:CORP.
Wikipedia is not to be used for promotion or publicity purposes, ever. Wikipedia must not be used to increase "exposure". A company must already have sufficient media exposure before it merits an article here, according to WP:CORP.
Because you have disclosed that you have a paid relationship with Workers101 (as you are required to do by Wikimedia:Terms of Use as a condition of creating your account), you have a WP:Conflict of interest.
Because you have a conflict of interest, the only venue available to you for publishing an article here is Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Don't try to create an article in the main space. Use your sandbox or create it in Draft space instead (for example Draft:Workers101).

Please review the links above before you proceed further. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:32, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mandatory disclosure of paid editing

Hello Piyush5767. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to workers101. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Piyush5767. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Piyush5767|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Brianhe (talk) 05:50, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]