User talk:Phaedriel/Archive 2

Thanks - My ignorance was no excuse

(cur) (last) 02:06, 5 January 2006 Phaedriel m (Um, exactly which part of "No sig on the article's main space, please" you didn't get, Willy?) Once I saw it disappear, Twice I knew it was purposeful. Now here's the good news. Three didn't happen.

That's what the history page is for. LOL I do get to sign here, right? - Sicerely, Thanks, with lots of embarassment. --Halcyon 01:44, 11 January 2006 (UTC)Willy Wonka[reply]

Me neither!

I couldn't help but eavesdrop myself! :-P [1] You might find this helpful in answering your question! Happy editing and I hope you join Esperanza! KnowledgeOf Self | talk 02:18, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage stuff

Yes, eavesdropping, thats how I found out about you fixing MONGO's (who has helped me since I joined this place) userpage. :) I dont use IE, so I never knew about the flaw, thank you very much for pointing it out for me! (And taking the time to take a picture of it and upload it!) I really like the modifications you designed (especially the fonts, and border thickness), however, is there any way to make it a more blueish color? About the same as links is what I'm thinking of. How long did it take you to do all that??

About Esperanza, the link from Knowledge of Self above will tell you a fair amount (if you havent found out already). The "e" in my sig (indeed, any green letter you see in people's signatures links to Esperanza. Esperanza is an organization of kind wikipedians, aiming to spread the wikilove around and serve wikipedia by preventing users from leaving the project. We try to make people feel appreciated for their work, and monitor stress levels and signs of users leaving wikipedia. We also have a few programs, here, which involve revamping userpages (my programming is useless, so I stay away from there) and among others, admin coaching, which I am helping with. There is also a calendar where wikipedians put their birthdays and first edit days and other holidays. Other Esperanzians will send them greetings on these days. We also hand out barnstars to make people feel that their contributions get noticed. In conclusion, Esperanza could do with kind people like you! :)There is a lot more I can tell you, but this message is way too long already!

Finally, here is a barnstar for you. All the best Banes 08:26, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why thank you! I love the first one, and have put it into use. The second hurts my eyes too! I am so grateful to you and Sango for fixing it for me! Esperanza is the greatest thing that has happened to wikipedia for a long time, and the project needs people like you. Hopefully I'll be seeing your name on the members list some time. Thanks again for all that you have done! See you Banes 15:51, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandal (user:71.194.115.95) on my page. I had been impressed by his cleverness, until I realized he was quoting what I had said about his own vanity article. (I wonder if that confirms his point?) I've given him a day in the time-out corner for his pains, but I suspect it's low yield. If he's related to the Robert Fairweather debacle of a year and a half ago, then he's on a dynamic IP and won't show up again for a long while. Geogre 18:27, 11 January 2006 (UTC) (1/32nd Creek Indian, which ain't much.)[reply]

Dear D'Juan

Hi Encyclopedist! I've been reading your contributions and your user page, and I must say that you give me the impression of being a very nice, sensitive and kind person. Might I ask you (if that's ok with you, of course), how come you're not an admin yet? You're obviously a dedicated and polite editor, and people seem to like you a lot. You have a heap of edits, and you've been here for a year now. Don't you feel it's time already? I would be honored if you allowed me to nominate such a great person as you are. Cheers! -- Phædriel ^*whistle* 22:58, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why, I am delighted. I was nominated once, and I do have to admit that I had a problem with some policies on Wikipedia - most of which I have worked on. Now, I seriously doubt that I would want to try out to be an administrator - I have found myself in deep disagreement with blocking policies, and what not, of admins. I am not to fond of some users being given rights that others do not have, so I really don't feel that I should be promoted to something I don't agree with. I feel delighted by your offer, but I have to decline. I am deeply sorry - but I doubt I would win. I am too different than others! ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 23:09, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

my RfA

I would like to express my thanks to all the good people who spent their valuable time time and effort working on my (failed) RfA voting. Especially for those who actually voted to support me :). Lets move on and make together our Wikipedia an even greater place abakharev 09:18, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Any Inputs

This is my article thus far... any input? Thanks xerocs 21:52, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for supporting me on my successful RfA! It passed with a final tally of 40/9/1. If there's anything I can do to help, just ask! Sceptr e ^(Talk)

My RfA

Phaedriel, thank you very much for supporting me during my recent RfA campaign! Thanks to you, I am now an admin. Please drop by if you need anything - I'll be glad to help you. Once again, thanks! --M @t hwiz 2020 22:50, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks from rogerd

File:Baseball (ball) closeup.jpg

Hi Phaedriel- Thanks for your support on my RfA. I appreciate the kind words that you used in your comments. If I can be of any service please leave me a message --rogerd 01:20, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

Yes we have a friendship that I am more that happy to accept :-). Y tendremos una amistad por siempre! ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 03:51, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks Phaedriel/Archive 2

Thanks for your recent support on my RfA. It passed with a final vote of 24/1/2 :-). If you ever need anything, feel free to leave me a message! --Admrboltz (T | C) 04:30, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

for reverting the vandalism to my userpage! --ViolinGirl^♪ 13:14, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, exactly! First time my page was vandalized, I was practically jumping up and down. My parents were like, "What? You're happy your page was vandalized?" ;) --ViolinGirl^♪ 13:52, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Film Project

I see you added my article Follow Me, Boys! to the Film Project, which is fine. Right after that, someone added my my article Island in the Sky (1953 film) to the project. However, there is another Undisputed (film) that no one has added yet. Could you add it? Since I'm not familiar with your project, I don't want to do it and possibly goof it up. See my talk page for other articles I've done. Rlevse 00:11, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Belated thanks

I now have a few extra tabs at the top of my Wikipedia pages. Thanks for your support. Banno 07:54, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

gracias

Thanks for taking a moment to revert my vandalized userpage :)

Warm regards, Adrian Lamo · (talk) · (mail) · 09:10, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thanks for supporting my Rfa, Phaedriel! I appreciate your trust. The puppy is now an Admin (final tally 58/7/2) Please let me know if there is anything I can ever do to assist you. KillerChihuahua^?!? 17:19, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

I don't have a fancy layout like other new admins, but I just want to thank you for your support at my RfA. It passed 48/3/1, so I have officially been promoted. I hope I won't let you down. If I'm not doing something properly, please tell me. Aecis ^{Mr. Mojo} ^risin' 21:02, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Your welcome ^_^ Deckiller 02:04, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Hamer

Hi! My brother wrote the original Frank Hamer article, which, as you noted, while factually correct, was way too political. Since he is no longer writing for wikipedia, I rewrote the article, and I believe you will find the things you objected to have been corrected. i was very fair in reporting facts without calling name number one. My brother is not happy, but I beleive the article is fair and appropriate for the encyclopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.50.125.89 (talk • contribs)

I wanted to say whoever wrote those cruel things about you should be banned from writing for life. I am bitter at the way my brother was treated on wikipedia, but you were treated at least as badly, and did nothing but try to help! Whoever did that to this woman, who is trying to help, you are a coward and cur. Mac1953 12:59, 15 January 2006 (UTC)Mac

No problem!

I was most glad to do it. People can be so terrible! So far so good, here. Hope you are well also. Katefan0^(scribble)/mrp 05:41, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ON this one, you did the right thing, though I think someone who writes something like that should be barred for life. Good contributers -- like my brother -- were driven from this project by cruelty, certainly this woman deserved better, heck any human being deserves better. Unlike some of the other editors, she has tried to be impartial, and fair. I am sorry that anyone would write such a thing. Mac1953 13:02, 15 January 2006 (UTC)Mac

i was horrified that anyone would use such language about you, or any other human being. I suppose I am speaking now as an old man. I am going to be 55 this year, and remember when no one would say such things about a woman, (not trying to be sexist, just honest!) and politeness was an imperative of civil society. The sad part is that we who grew up in the 50's and 60's really believed we were making a better world. It appears we failed sadly! A person making personal attacks of this type should be barred forever from this project! On a personal note, I am the original author of the Frank Hamer article. i wanted to thank you for your wording of the critique you made of it. The facts are true, and I can exhaustively prove every one. HOWEVER, you were absolutely right that the language was way overboard, and needed changing. i wanted to thank you for your professional observations that the article was way too inflamatory, true or not, (and it was true!). I also wish to apologize to you for the vast majority of users, who value good editors, and would not make such cruel, vile, heartless comments. Please don't let a small minority of nasty fanatics ruin your good work! old windy bear 00:43, 16 January 2006 (UTC)oldwindybear[reply]

Good morning! I have rewritten the Frank Hamer article, with an attempt to eliminate the trigger phrases that you referred to, and to try to be fair. The biography does source every fact cited, and what I tried in the rewrite to get accross was that people perception on this man depend on your core beliefs: if you think a company has the right to use any means it has to to prevent a strike from ruining it, you support Frank Hamer; if you are pro-union, or anti-use-of-force-by businesses, Hamer does not come off so well. As for the Bonnie and Clyde part, no one now disputes that she was not wanted for any capital offense, but i still changed the words "murder" to "possible," because the fact is, no court is going to rule whether he committed a crime or not,all we can do is present the facts. Anyway, I asked Kate, and would like you also, to take a look at the rewrite, and please be as blunt as possible. old windy bear 16:14, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFA thanks

Thanks for supporting me in my RFA. --TimPope 13:56, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article you nominated for deletion

I don't completely understand this myself, but I believe that I deleted that article just as you were moninating it for speedy. When this happens, due to a bug in the software, the revision created by the original author gets deleted and the article gets recreated, with only the revision of the person who nominated it for speedy. Because of this, I actually had to delete the article twice. This is quite annoying and has caused confusion before, but I don't know if it will ever be fixed. Hope that helps, and keep up the good work. Academic Challenger 00:32, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User page

I'm not very good with design, and I noticed your kind offer to help with this! Could you give me a few pointers? I'd very much appreciate it :-) Ta bu shi da yu 06:54, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your message and sandbox

I like the border touch you have going there. Is this for me? Linuxbeak (drop me a line) 15:32, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA and Oklahoma stuff

Thank you for your support in my RfA. It is good to see another Oklahoman here. (I'm in Bartlesville). When I am bored with illuminated manuscripts, I pick at List of Registered Historic Places in Oklahoma. I'd like to eventually see every historic site in the state have an article. Since you are in OKC, I thought you might like to have a go at some of those sites. Also you might be interested in doing something with Quanah Parker Star House in Commanche County Dsmdgold 20:23, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just because...

...you haven't heard of someone, doesn't mean they are not well known. There are plenty of articles on people I am sure you have never heard of in this encyclopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulwithap (talk • contribs) 19:44, 16 January 2006