User talk:PhD09

November 2012

Your recent editing history at Bal Thackeray shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Sitush (talk) 20:00, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bal Thackeray

Quotations should be attributed to the person who is being quoted, therefore retaining his name is relevant. - Sitush (talk) 13:58, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This edit is POV, undue weight (why only Bihar?) and contrary to WP:CITEKILL guidance. Please remove it. - Sitush (talk) 14:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've just reverted another edit - please could you take a look at WP:HONORIFIC. Per the notice above, if you change this stuff again any time soon then you'll be risking a block. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 14:22, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]