User talk:Kompas

Thanks for helping with spammers. Pavel Vozenilek 22:32, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Stirlitz

You should check the page's history. Firstly, it used to be stated there that Stirlitz is a Russified spelling of German "Stierlitz". Secondly, I merged this page with Otto von Stirlitz, which explained his rank in the Nazi army as colonel. If you think these statements are false, you may edit the article as you think fit. --Ghirlandajo 14:52, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Please note that you can write

...the number of [[necklace (combinatorics)|necklaces]] is...

and the reader sees

...the number of necklaces is...

and when they click on "necklaces", they are directed to necklace (combinatorics), so you do not need to write

...the number of necklace (combinatorics)s is...

as you did in Moreau's necklace-counting function.

Also, you should use the see-also section of an article only for related topics, not for other topics with the same name. At necklace, you could have written at the top of the article:

{{dablink|For another sense of this word, see [[necklace (combinatorics)]].}}

and the reader would see

For another sense of this word, see necklace (combinatorics).

(italicized automatically by the "dablink" template).

I've now reated a new page titled necklace (disambiguation) and put a dablink at necklace. Michael Hardy 19:01, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for all your help. I did not notice the broken link in Moreau's necklace-counting function. I supposed the [[necklace (combinatorics)]]s to render as necklaces due to combination of () hiding and plural rule, but I forgot the pipe to make it the correct [[necklace (combinatorics)|]]s, which works. Also thanks for directing me to the {{dablink}}, the See also section was definitely not the right idea. I keep forgetting things when I am out for a while.

Considering the merging, of Moreau's necklace-counting function, Lyndon word and necklace (combinatorics), I agree that the first one shall merge, but I am not sure which of the two other should it merege into. The function itself does not deserve own article, it is doubled in Lyndon word, moreover it contains definition of necklace, which also fits elsewhere. I hope to take care of that. Kompas 20:44, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merging article Bracelet to Necklace (combinatorics)

I'm recommending that the article on Bracelet (combinatorics) be merged into Necklace (combinatorics).

I saw that you had previously edited one (or both) of these article. You're invited to participate in the discussion here: Talk:Necklace (combinatorics).

Thanks, Justin W Smith ^talk/_stalk 15:13, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sinster Slug listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sinster Slug. Since you had some involvement with the Sinster Slug redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:19, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]