User talk:PeeJay/Archive 22
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:PeeJay. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 15 | ← | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:19, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Wales badge... an exception? for who?
Hi, I have noticed that you happily reverted all my edits on different Wales national teams. What I don't know is what criteria you were based on for those reversions; It's hard to understand why the Wales Association logo appears in 8 (!) articles while other NFCC images such as Brazilian CBF logo were only allowed to be displayed on the CBF article (the same with Argentine FA or other similar badges that appear on one or two articles at most).
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
So, why Wales national teams should be exempted from that? In fact, association badges were removed from most of all u19 or u21 teams articles (p.e. Argentina, Brazil, Germany, Spain, etc) due to NFCC criteria, so I would like you give me a reasonable argument to support your reversions. Otherwise, I will restore the changes. Thanks, - Fma12 (talk) 23:42, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
FIFA World Cup Finals List
On other football lists (eg. List of Premier League Winners) you have the amount of times a respective team have won the competition, why not this list? Furthermore, it adds extra depth to the article. ThomasTurner31 (talk) 19:05, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Manchester United Badge 1973-1998.png
Thank you for uploading File:Manchester United Badge 1973-1998.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:04, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Czech Republic
Hello. There's a discussion at the reference desk on which I would appreciate any input you are able to provide. I see that this is an issue with which you are familiar. Regards, --Viennese Waltz 06:41, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Lee Grant
Grant has played with the no. 13 shirt on his back for all the tour matches. If that doesn't qualify him as United's no. 13 then nothing does. Mn1548 (talk) 19:58, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- The only thing that qualifies Lee Grant as having been given the #13 jersey is United officially announcing either his squad number specifically or the squad as a whole. As you can see on the club's website, Grant has not yet been officially given a number. The only reason Fred has is so people can start buying his shirt! – PeeJay 20:11, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Firstly, don't split conversations over two pages. Secondly, if he's announced as a different shirt number later - that's later. The fact is that he is playing in the no. 13 shirt so that makes him number 13! If Lukaku started playing in the no. 10 shirt unannounced, it's clear that United have given him the no. 10 shirt therefore not being the no. 9 anymore. Things don't have to be publicly announced to be true. Mn1548 (talk) 20:21, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Man Utd Trophy Tally
There's nothing wrong with listing the full count as far as I can see. It isnt being listed to prove United have more trophies than anyone in England, that is already sourced seperately. This is a different statement entirely, and as it is officially sourced and factually accurate I dont see a reason for why it cannot be used. Davefelmer (talk) 03:11, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:09, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:32, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:29, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:05, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
I don't think MoS agrees. If it does, you've inconsistency elsewhere, e.g. Reviewing his performance on his first-team debut the Manchester Guardian newspaper commented that "he showed promise of fine ability in passing and shooting, but will have to move faster as a wing half". KJP1 (talk) 07:15, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi PeeJay. I appreciate that we don't use sponsored competition names on Wikipedia but the competition has been renamed from the European Rugby Champions Cup to Heineken Champions Cup for the 2018-19 season and was previously known as the Heineken Cup from 1995 to 2014, and has pages for seasons that use this format. Most people searching for information will probably type in Heineken Champions Cup if looking for information. I don't mind using European Rugby Champions Cup and this is best title for the competition, but at the same time this is not the official name of the competition. I will leave it as it is but I think more specific feedback on this is required rather than simply reverting the page changes. Thanks. Jgjsmith006 (talk) 13:10, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Further to our discussion I have mentioned this on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rugby union so that editors are aware of Wiki guidelines and hopefully we avoid any further confusion. Thanks. Jgjsmith006 (talk) 13:45, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi PeeJay2K3, I noticed you've removed the "Attendances" section on the 2018-19 season's page stating that "this doesn't seem particularly encyclopaedic to me". I personally disagree, I'd say statistics are encyclopedic. Also, if what you are stating is the case, shouldn't every single other season's page have said content removed from them as well, in the aim of consistency across related pages? I - and no doubt other editors - thank you for helping with the cleaning up of the page.
Also I would like your opinion on the idea of including a template or box/notice at the top of the page to indicate to other users that the page is a "work in progress" and is being updated regularly (ie after every match or so). I'll also add this to the point to the WT:RU page to get wider opinions. Thanks. --Jordan8396.ja (talk) 18:41, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Just seen this as well. I agree with alot of your points PeeJay2K3 but I don't think taking out information on the attendances is particularly helpful. Also season records can be used to give all time statistical information which is of interest to people. I would like to put back this information or at least have a more general consensus rather than one user deciding what constitutes encyclopaedic information. Jgjsmith006 (talk) 21:55, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- PeeJay2K3. I have reverted some of your edits regarding attendance information and statistical records. Some of the reasons given were that no sources have been added - this has been rectified in some areas while others will be added. It's a little disappointing that a message hasn't been left on editors talk pages explaining what changes have been made and why. It also disappointing after you provided such good advice on competition naming, which was insightful, constructive and reasonable, something the mass blanking of page sections is not. Jgjsmith006 (talk) 22:19, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Jordan8396.ja and Jgjsmith006: Apologies, but I was simply being bold by removing content that I felt fell foul of Wikipedia guidelines. Personally, I feel that a table of attendance figures is a violation of WP:NOTSTATS; as it says, Wikipedia is not a stats almanac, and a breakdown of each team's highest, lowest and average attendances is pretty useless in the grand scheme of things. In 20 years' time, I can well imagine that people will be looking for historical results, but they won't be looking to find out which team had the highest average attendance in any particular season. As for the stats records, those are fine to an extend provided that they're adequately sourced. I'm still not convinced that a season-by-season breakdown of which game had the highest margin of victory or which player kicked the most drop goals is particularly useful, and it almost smacks of original research to me. While it's possible to provide a link to each of those games, I haven't seen any independent sources that actually aggregate these stats, which would be the primary indicator to me that they're worth recording in a similar way here (and even then I might object as if the info is available in that form somewhere else, why should we bother to mirror it? Stats should be used to augment prose, we shouldn't simply present them out of context in a list). – PeeJay 22:49, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- I appreciate your apology and respect that you have provided a decent and reasoned explanation for doing what you have done but you have to understand that if you go around blanking sections it can cause problems with other editors, as well as put people off editing in the future, particularly new editors. Regarding attendances, I think that if the information can be properly sourced, and is relevant to the competition, then I think it should stand, unless a majority of other editors disagree. I don't think this is a decision one person can make. With regards to the individual stats, both Rugby Statbunker and the EPCR have similiar data - which I can add as source links later this week. Jgjsmith006 (talk) 08:05, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Jordan8396.ja and Jgjsmith006: Apologies, but I was simply being bold by removing content that I felt fell foul of Wikipedia guidelines. Personally, I feel that a table of attendance figures is a violation of WP:NOTSTATS; as it says, Wikipedia is not a stats almanac, and a breakdown of each team's highest, lowest and average attendances is pretty useless in the grand scheme of things. In 20 years' time, I can well imagine that people will be looking for historical results, but they won't be looking to find out which team had the highest average attendance in any particular season. As for the stats records, those are fine to an extend provided that they're adequately sourced. I'm still not convinced that a season-by-season breakdown of which game had the highest margin of victory or which player kicked the most drop goals is particularly useful, and it almost smacks of original research to me. While it's possible to provide a link to each of those games, I haven't seen any independent sources that actually aggregate these stats, which would be the primary indicator to me that they're worth recording in a similar way here (and even then I might object as if the info is available in that form somewhere else, why should we bother to mirror it? Stats should be used to augment prose, we shouldn't simply present them out of context in a list). – PeeJay 22:49, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- PeeJay2K3. I have reverted some of your edits regarding attendance information and statistical records. Some of the reasons given were that no sources have been added - this has been rectified in some areas while others will be added. It's a little disappointing that a message hasn't been left on editors talk pages explaining what changes have been made and why. It also disappointing after you provided such good advice on competition naming, which was insightful, constructive and reasonable, something the mass blanking of page sections is not. Jgjsmith006 (talk) 22:19, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:08, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
References
It's been a long time, but I was wondering if you could help add references to 1888–89 Newton Heath LYR F.C. season? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 07:51, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:51, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Sampdoria badge.png
Thanks for uploading File:Sampdoria badge.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
2018–19 Champions League
So are we now using "Inter Milan" vs "Internazionale" for CL articles? Was there a referendum on this? I'm confused why a lone editor would decide he felt it should be different without any sort of discussion. Or maybe I'm simply in the wrong here. Could you explain this for me? Cheers. Italia2006 (talk) 22:44, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Okay here.
Here's your talk page answer: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League.GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 01:04, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. – PeeJay 01:10, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
CL Group C Table
2018–19 UEFA Champions League group stage (Undid revision 867700910 by RokknRoul (talk) huh?
"Fix? Napoli do not lead Group C. See the UEFA link. Strange but true: Head to Head counts after the group games are played."
Source: UEFA https://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2019/standings/round=2000980/index.html#/grp-2006093
PS
Can you fix? (I can't) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RokknRoul (talk • contribs) 15:30, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
"There is nothing wrong with the table. UEFA is incorrect to not apply tie-breaking criteria before the end of the group stage.
– PeeJay 15:34, 7 November 2018 (UTC)"
Yeah. UEFA is not updated? :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RokknRoul (talk • contribs) 16:05, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
"There is nothing wrong with the table. UEFA is incorrect to not apply tie-breaking criteria before the end of the group stage."
Do you think FIFA and The Olympics are incorrect too? It's silly that FIFA and UEFA have different rules. So... New UEFA rules? RokknRoul —Preceding undated comment added 10:31, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Also Soccerstats ... incorrect? :) "wikipedia" ... https://www.soccerstats.com/leagueview.asp?league=cleague RokknRoul
"Full back"
I'm glad you take umbrage with this as well. Italia2006 (talk) 23:58, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, PeeJay2K3. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 end-of-year rugby union internationals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liam Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:2018–19 UEFA Europa League#Category:Pages where template include size is exceeded
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:2018–19 UEFA Europa League#Category:Pages where template include size is exceeded. Hhkohh (talk) 11:05, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011–12 UEFA Europa League first qualifying round. Hhkohh (talk) 05:10, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:55, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Natwest 6 Nations logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Natwest 6 Nations logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:40, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:EA Sports 10 games
Template:EA Sports 10 games has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 13:55, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
A couple of bits
Hi PeeJay, while doing an AWB run, I came across Gilbert Godsmark, which you created in 2008. Most of the content was removed in 2016 as unreferenced, although I assume the genref you had added would have covered this. Some of the detail about his army career and death have since been readded without sources. If you still have the book, I imagine you could restore your stuff with an inline cite without too much trouble.
Also, I recently expanded the Frank O'Farrell article and discovered that his start date at Man U was actually 1 July 1971. It's generally reported to be June, but that was when he was announced as manager, not when his contract actually started. Do you think that should be reflected on other Man U pages?
"Now Leicester Move Quickly for New Manager". Coventry Evening Telegraph. 9 June 1971. p. 30. Retrieved 27 November 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
Last night's United statement said that O'Farrell would take up his new post on July 1, the day after his present contract with Leicester expires.
Cheers, Nzd (talk) 19:02, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi PeeJay2K3, the reason I'm asking is because you've been the most consistent and helpful editor of the page, would you be able to correct the nationality and background of Giuliano Maiorana in the article, please? As I'm sure you're aware, there's been a lot of confusion over this and even the Maiorana surname article leaves out his nationality. At one time an IP made an unsourced claim that Maiorana's parents were from Avellino but I've found this interview (which would make a good source) where Maiorana himself confirms this and his nationality. Other IPs have since removed information and categories relating to this and I'm still unsure about were him being born in Cambridge and FIFA eligibility rules come in and how to phrase it. Please let me know what you think, cheers. Theo Mandela (talk) 16:51, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:22, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
2005 Champions League Final
Hi, I noticed you removed the source I added. The source was not meant to reference the 2005 final but merely to source who the UEFA "football family" actually was in order to fix the clarification tag that had been placed on the article. Kosack (talk) 10:49, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- That's fine, I was only dealing with the "football family" issue rather than the whole section. Kosack (talk) 10:59, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Ospreys badge.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 06:22, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Managerial Source
Hello, Please can you explain why no source is needed. The more references the better Wikipedia is. --Skyblueshaun (talk) 19:34, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Montpellier herault badge.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 12:48, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Newport rfc badge.png
Thanks for uploading File:Newport rfc badge.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
2009-10 NFC Championship page
You removed several edits I made to this page. The article cited that discusses the NFL overtime rule change specifically states that their sources did not think this game had anything to do with the rule change. They mention the Vikings voting against the rule change as evidence of their reasoning. I do not understand why that would be removed when it is in the linked article. The other statement about broadcasters widely noting the brutality of the game was not supported by the linked article and there was no other source provided. The game did gain increased notoriety after the Bountygate scandal, which is why that portion was left in the article. The factual information about the penalties is relevant to the discussion about whether the Saints team was excessively rough during that season. I do not want to be rude, and you certainly seem to be a thorough contributor, but I don’t understand why you would remove these edits without checking the sources first. You would have seen that the edits are accurate. Thank you for your time. JDPH21 (talk) 03:57, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
2010–11 Premier League
Hi, there. I want to thank you for helping me in finishing up the West Midlands section of the map in the teams for the 2010–11 Premier League. I really appreciate it. I'm just trying to make the team locations more clear and understanding for other users. I hope my efforts are not seen as vandalism.TB Chigz (talk) 16:45, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:36, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Moving of picture
Hello PeeJay2K3. I see that you moved the inserted picture i just recently added in the 1994 FIFA World Cup knockout stage (which I don't think have that many pictures in it from before), but I kinda liked it better where I put it it didn't mess up the rest of the article that much at least in desktop view (havent tried any other view though). Best regards Migrant (talk) 00:33, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Flag of Italy
Flag of Italy
http://www.worldstatesmen.org/Italy.htm
https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/it.html
There has been no change in the flag of italy since 1946 to today (except for 2003-2006). The 1946-2003 flag should be the same as today.
--Havsjö (talk) 10:26, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:03, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Tom Cleverley
Any evidence he is from Basingstoke or Hampshire? Being born there is not enough. He grew up in Bradford and describes himself as a "Bradford lad"... GiantSnowman 16:10, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
- That's not evidence. How many Welsh people have been born in Chester because that's the nearest maternity hospital? GiantSnowman 16:13, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
- Because being from somewhere and being born somewhere are not the same. Shall we introduce Category:People from the sea for those born at sea? (and yes I am aware there is Category:People born at sea - note that is named 'born', not 'from'... GiantSnowman 17:04, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
2009 UEFA Champions League Final
Oversimplifying references? What do you mean? Please be more specific. Colonies Chris (talk) 10:24, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hi PeeJay - First of all, the Union of European Football Associations is universally known as UEFA. Even our own article is titled UEFA. Anyone who knows enough about football to be reading about the 2009 UEFA Champions League Final doesn't need to have the meaning of UEFA spelled out every time it's referred to. The same is true of FIFA. Secondly - websites. The URL provides the address, and the name of the publisher informs the reader of the source. "website=UEFA.com" is redundant as that information is already right there in the URL; "publisher=UEFA" gives you the source organisation. In addition, when the source is a newspaper or magazine, website in the form of an actual address is not usually helpful - what's more helpful is the publication name e.g. "work=The Guardian" is more informative than "website=theguardian.com". (In addition, in some cases I fixed, the website parameter was actually wrong - it speciifed "theguardian.co.uk" where the URL has "theguardian.com"). Also, for newspapers and magazines, publisher is usually redundant (see the documentation for the publisher parameter in the {{cite news}} template: "Not normally used for periodicals." and "Omit where the publisher's name is substantially the same as the name of the work"). Nobody who's checking a fact gains anything from being told that The Sunday Times is published by Times Newspapers, for example. I also sorted out as lot of references to "BBC Sport (British Broadcasting Corporation)". This is unnecessary and unhelpful clutter. The Wikipedia article on BBC Sport is titled BBC Sport, not British Broadcasting Corporation Sport, because the BBC is almost universally known by its initials. Colonies Chris (talk) 14:16, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
2018-19 NFL Playoffs
That is suppose to be in a High level category read my mind. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 16:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
January 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nicolás Otamendi; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:50, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Six Nations Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Huw Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Scott McTominay youth career
Hello, I've started a discussion at Talk:Scott McTominay regarding the "youth career" issue. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 16:54, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Start time of Superbowl
I do understand that the information is on the internet, but everyone does want to know. I thought I was being helpful. How about leaving it in and the deleting after the game? Like when was being needed a standard for content inclusion on Wikipedia? Kd4ttc (talk) 20:49, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
I searched the article and didn’t find that.Kd4ttc (talk) 21:42, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Duh for me. It’s in the Box Score section. Never mind! Kd4ttc (talk) 21:45, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Lol! Looks like we both recognized the Mea Culpa simultaneously! Keep up the good work, thanks for the kindness, and I hop you’re enjoying the game! Steve Kd4ttc (talk) 01:25, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Spurs 3-4 City
Hey PeeJay. Just wanted to drop by and say thanks again for your support in keeping the Spurs/City FA Cup match article alive. Our efforts have been rewarded with the dubious accolade of having been quoted in the Daily Mail. Thought you might get a kick out of that, the same as I did this morning. Falastur2 Talk 23:16, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 NFL playoffs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greg Zuerlein (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:50, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Explanation
Hi, can you explain me why Football kit templates should not shows original logos? --FootKalos1597 (talk) 16:08, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
I think that there's not a violation of copyright when you show a commercial logo on a football kit, because it's a sponsor, an advertisement, it means that the owner of this logo paid the football club to show that logo. So if an image of that football kit shows that logo, it's still an advertising, there's not legal reason to judge that logo as a copyright violation. --FootKalos1597 (talk) 16:46, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Man Utd Busby era edit
I'm not obsessed with the CS particularly, just wanted a transitioning sentence going from the title win in 52 to talking about the Busby Babes and their titles. Seems a bit unnatural in the way its phrased, or do you not think? Davefelmer (talk) 00:39, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:11, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Man thanks for revision, I thought that it was "International" with Brazil, not the Internacional the club, misread it. Sorry and thanks. :D — SimplyFreddie (talk) 17:06, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Category:Seasons in Macedonian football has been nominated for discussion
Category:Seasons in Macedonian football, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 07:19, 11 March 2019 (UTC)