User talk:Pedrosalves93

Speedy deletion nomination of Tricia Campbell

Hello Pedrosalves93,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tricia Campbell for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. OccultZone (Talk) 03:32, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tricia Campbell

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tricia Campbell, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. GILO A&E⇑ 09:56, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted that article for two reasons. Firstly, yes, it was unduly promotional - not its structure, but the content itself. For example, "Tricia Campbell is an accomplished Plus Size Supermodel, Motivator, Entrepreneur and Trailblazer who is gaining recognition as a symbol of confidence and a voice of encouragement to women everywhere." - says who? Herself? Yeah, right... Secondly, the text was copy-pasted from her own website, which says "All Rights Reserved" - a copyright violation. If you are associated with Campbell's PR team you may want to take a look at Wikipedia's guideline on conflicts of interest. Huon (talk) 11:01, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When an article you wrote gets deleted, simply re-creating that same article without meaningful changes is not a good idea. Persisting in adding spam and copyrights violations to Wikipedia will have consequences. Huon (talk) 11:09, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please..... check the copywrite references, and if you need confirm them before taking your own decisions. That would help.

I did, I checked the source for the content, it said "All Rights Reserved" which is not compatible with Wikipedia's CC BY-SA 3.0 License. Claiming on Wikipedia that it's freely licensed is not enough - there's no evidence that you are allowed to enter legally binding contracts for The Fount Group. Also, her website says the copyright is owned by Tricia Campbell, not The Fount Group, so unless you want to claim that the copyright note on her own website is wrong, The Fount Group cannot release the rights anyway. That said, while it's technically possible to donate copyrighted content to be used under a free license that allows everybody to re-use and modify it for any purpose, including commercial purposes, Campbell's biography on her own website is unduly promotional and would be (and was) deleted for that reason too, even if it were freely licensed. I'm running out of patience with your attempts to promote your client on Wikipedia. Consider this a final warning. Huon (talk) 11:26, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Violation

Your addition to Tricia Campbell has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. OccultZone (Talk) 11:13, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Plase, confirm the copywrite with http://thefountgroup.com/

Pedrosalves93, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Pedrosalves93! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]