User talk:PartyPerson 880

April 2015

Hello, I'm Howicus. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Typographical error because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 23:23, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at World War III with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Amaury (talk) 23:24, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Amaury with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk) 23:26, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PartyPerson 880 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1-I apologize for the destructive behavior you have encountered. This type of action will never happen again. It was my first time joining and I hadn't read the rules, or warnings. Once again, I apologize.

Decline reason:

Under the circumstances, a standard offer approach could be taken in this case. PhilKnight (talk) 20:06, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

PartyPerson 880 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1-I was told I should take a standard offer approach: I was hoping to be unblocked yesterday or today, not in something like 6-12 months. I already explained that I was in understanding to why I got Blocked, and that a good standing should return to me. That's like telling me your going to throw me in jail for half a year for spray painting a wall. I wish to be unblocked, and I understand fully why I was blocked. I believe I should have a second chance, especially since I am a new user, and was still getting familiar with the site. (If I was to be kept from being unblocked, that's like telling a 4 year old he's going to jail for breaking a rule.)

Accept reason:

I have consulted the blocking administrator, and we have agreed to give you another chance. Please be careful about how you edit, to avoid being blocked again. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:25, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any particular edits in mind that you want to make if unblocked? Max Semenik (talk) 23:36, 14 April

No, not now.

Welcome!

Hello PartyPerson 880! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need any help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting "adopted" by an experienced user How to: edit a page • upload and use images • start an article

Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention

Policies and guidelines

Neutral point of view • No original research
Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources
What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons

Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule
Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy
External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry
Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

User community

Build consensus • Resolve disputes
Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette
No personal attacks • No legal threats

Community Portal • Village pump
Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists

Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review

Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing!

August 2015

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Civilization V, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Conifer (talk) 06:23, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Um dude, I messed it up, then I fixed it less than ten minutes later. I shouldn't be warned as I fixed a mistake and just went to the sandbox.

You were unblocked on the condition that you would edit productively. It doesn't matter whether you fix your "mistakes"; if you vandalize again, you're likely to be reblocked indefinitely. Conifer (talk) 06:32, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]