User talk:WebSolEditor

I have removed all external site links from the content sections and referenced them down under resources.

WebSolEditor, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi WebSolEditor! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 02:04, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox

Moved from User talk:Paccar984/Sandbox

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I am trying to make necessary corrections to this page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Paccar984/Sandbox

To correct the External links, should I just link the text in the article to a wiki page, then add the external link below in the External Links section? Please see how I updated the J.D. Power link in the Business Career section. Is that correct?
Thank you!!
WebSolEditor (talk) 18:29, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The External Links look fine to me. Could you be more specific as to your concern? Achowat (talk) 19:48, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hi WebSolEditor,

Welcome to the teahouse! If you need help with any specific problem regarding your articles and content, you are always welcome to add a question here anytime. Another editor will reply to your question very soon. I wish you success in Wikipedia and hope that you can have as much fun as I had. Happy editing!--Lionratz (talk) 14:05, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you improve the actual article?

Hi, I noticed that you keep working on another user's sandbox page User:Paccar984/Sandbox, instead of improving the actual article at Mark Pigott. As the latter has been tagged with multiple issues for years, why do you not work on that page? If it's perhaps because you have a conflict of interest, have you asked an independent editor to improve the article based on the sandbox version? – Fayenatic London 21:40, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback

I can't publish the changes from the Sandbox until I have approval from Mr. Pigott. He wants to review all changes in the Sandbox before they go live to the public. This is why I work in the Sandbox. As soon as I have approval, the changes will get published.

WebSolEditor (talk) 20:13, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's holding up the improvement of a page which has been in terrible condition for years. It's up to you, you've got your job to watch, but it seems a bit silly to me as anyone else in the world can edit that page! Meanwhile, I've blocked the old Paccar984 accounts, and moved the sandbox to User:WebSolEditor/sandbox as you're the main editor working on it now. The old page is redirected, so any external links to the old page will still work. – Fayenatic London 22:20, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree and hope to get the live page updated soon. I appreciate your guidance.

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark Pigott, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Trinity College and Cutting-edge. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback! I will get these corrected.

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, WebSolEditor. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 23:51, 26 February 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Pigott (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Mark Pigott instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is essentially the same as the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Pigott and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mark Pigott, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:15, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]