User talk:Ottoground

This is Ottoground's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrea Cappi (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Chaotic Enby were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It could be good if you specifically pointed to WP:THREE in-depth, independent secondary sources that show notability. Currently, you gave a table with many references but it's not clear what they're referencing exactly (see WP:REFBOMB), and they shouldn't be added just for the sake of it, but rather reference the article's content (thus the need for them to be in-depth).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrea Cappi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 12:12, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ottoground! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 12:12, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Chaotic Enby. No probs at all. I decided not to create the page anymore. I want to delete it.

Sorry for the time you spend on it.

Thanks, best Ottoground (talk) 19:16, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Drafts are deleted after 6 months of not being edited, or you can add {{db-g7}} to the top of the draft if you want it to be deleted right now. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 19:29, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yigit Turhan (November 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yigit Turhan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:54, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eugenio Gollini (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Maliner was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eugenio Gollini and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Maliner (talk) 17:42, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Emanuele Orsini has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Emanuele Orsini. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:16, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for the suggestion, I have just deleted those.

Thanks ! Ottoground (talk) 09:18, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Toschi Vignola (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more secondary sources. The la Repubblica article is pretty good, the 24 ore one somewhat less so, but in any case two isn't enough to satisfy WP:NCORP.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Toschi Vignola and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:24, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emanuele Orsini (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TheTechie were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emanuele Orsini and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 22:28, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Coresight Research Inc. (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Coresight Research Inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 17:00, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts

Hi @Ottoground, I see you've attempted to create a few drafts - all of which were declined. To avoid further frustration, may I recommend you have a read of the following?

- Our notability criteria: Wikipedia:Notability. Only topics that pass this criteria merit an article.

- How to reference with in-line citations in the Visual Editor: Help:Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor/1.

- Our neutrality policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch. qcne (talk) 17:03, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot ! Very helpful.

I think I got the last one (Andrea Cappi) right, finally.

Please let me know what you think.

Thanks for your support Ottoground (talk) 17:08, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful of Wikipedia:Citation overkill - does the first line really need 7 citations? qcne (talk) 17:09, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for the suggestion: I have just deleted some and reduced them Ottoground (talk) 17:18, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May be ready for submission for review, now @Ottoground (I haven't looked at it in detail myself, but at least it is referenced correctly). qcne (talk) 17:21, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I already submitted for review. Didn't I ? Ottoground (talk) 17:22, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes, sorry- you have! qcne (talk) 17:23, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot ! Your support was super useful ! Ottoground (talk) 17:24, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrea Cappi has been accepted

Andrea Cappi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tesleemah (talk) 12:19, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ShopTalk

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ShopTalk, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:28, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

I strongly suggest that you concentrate on getting a draft accepted instead of creating lots of inadequate drafts which I've been mopping up. You seem to be acting in good faith, but learn the ropes first Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:40, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]