User talk:Oroboros 1

Can of Worms

Currently writing a review of music and decided to investigate a wiki article. Talk:Midnight_Syndicate#Disputing_NPOV Too late to turn back now. I'm hooked on how this little soap opera will pan out.

Proposed changes to Midnight Syndicate. See discussion.

Previously, I must have talked to the wrong person about your passage to protect Midnight Syndicate because of vandals. Although you did fine, I believe you did not notice the instructions in wikipedia:requests for page protection. Rather than re-editing it for you, I want to let you know about this, that's all. You'll thank me for that. --Gh87 21:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I read your replies, and I want to say that those reasons may be it. However, you're so close. By rephrasing my words, I meant to say was that either you put semi-protection, full protection, move protection, or more than one request. That's what you forgot. --Gh87 03:42, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully I put this one to rest. Had a long weekend to do nothing but read. What else does one do on Halloween? I really, really tried for NPOV/Verifiability/Notability and I think I nailed it. Talk:Midnight_Syndicate#Unprotected

3RR Warning

You have violated WP:3RR on Midnight Syndicate, please refrain from reverting the article again. If you violate 3RR further, you may be blocked from editing. Dionyseus 19:10, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

D: You have mistakenly and I believe maliciously posted a 3RR warning on my talk page. I did not revert any content. I have been adding content all along, and it is all verifiable. I'll ask you to double check, look at my references and the content added (which includes the content my opposition added while the matter was under discussion), and remove the warning on my page. I will also request that you note how my opposition refuses to enter into any discussion, refuses to acknowledge anything, and though I have tried to make concessions to work through our differences, they have made none whatsoever. What is your role in this. Are you attempting to help mediate or have you already chosen a side? I believe you are biased given your affiliations. Pleas show me you can mediate without just reverting my valid contributions. Oroboros 1 22:18, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On the contrary, a revert may involve as little as adding or deleting a few words. Please give WP:3RR a read. Dionyseus 23:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New start maybe...

This won't make you feel any better, but Dionyseus allowed SkinnyMcGee to make about 6 reverts with no 3RR warning. Nepotism sucks. I think I got busted for same when trying to equalize the slanted statements. On a happy note, Durova has a new proposal that looks promising. It's pretty much what you proposed earlier but the band references Durova suggests as a template are a bit cleaner. Plus, she seems to want to take a NPOV on the issue. Don't know how much time she can devote to this, though. Talk:Midnight_Syndicate#A_modest_proposal Check it out. GuardianZ 16:00, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Opening that can of worms again, huh? I can't object. Good luck. GuardianZ 22:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]