Jump to content

User talk:NickandJosh2014

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Optoscribe)

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, NickandJosh2014, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Draft:Optoscribe, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Missvain (talk) 18:13, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


License tagging for File:Optoscribe logo.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Optoscribe logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Optoscribe logo.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Optoscribe logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Optoscribe (June 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Sionk (talk) 16:47, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Optoscribe (June 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! . Unfortunately, It has been rejected again: here's why

There are two major problems: First, there is no indication that the company is actual notable--this requires substantial coverage from reliable published sources independent of the company, not routine announcements, and not press-releases. Second, the article is essentially an advertisement, not a description: it needs to be written not to say what the company wants to say to prospective clients, but what a general reader might want to know.

Until you can find such reliable sources, and rewrite completely to eliminate the promotionalism, please do not re-submit the article

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
DGG ( talk ) 00:03, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Optoscribe (August 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

Missvain (talk) 18:12, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! NickandJosh2014, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!


Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, NickandJosh2014. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Draft:Optoscribe, you may have a conflict of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Missvain (talk) 18:13, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]