User talk:Keihatsu

Portal:International relations

You've made a good start at Portal:International relations! I've created the three missing subpages Portal:International relations/Selected article, Portal:International relations/Selected biography and Portal:International relations/Selected picture. These will help you to keep track of which numbered subpages you've created. -- John of Reading (talk) 06:33, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that.Keihatsu (talk) 15:05, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Keihatsu. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 13:55, 19 September 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Keihatsu. You have new messages at Steven Zhang's talk page.
Message added 12:35, 24 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Steven Zhang ^{Help resolve disputes!} 12:35, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

WP:POLITICIAN #3 is the basis for querying the notability of Alex Burton. AllyD (talk) 21:12, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ally. The link you provided notes that being an unelected candidate for political office "does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the primary notability criterion of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article." I think this person meets that criteria. He launched his campaign yesterday, and is already the subject of at least two profiles in major newspapers,[1][2] as well as being mentioned in some national coverage.[3] Over the next week or so I can probably uncover more sources. What do you think? It looks like most of the other declared and prospective candidates for this election also have their own pages (including some who have not previously held office — see the discussion here[4]). Keihatsu (talk) 21:17, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Mourdock

I understand your position, but I think the sources are there. We will see how the AfD goes. Casprings (talk) 02:37, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note, and best of luck with the AfD. I realize I was pretty quick to nominate, and maybe you weren't finished adding sources. Keihatsu (talk) 02:41, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Love your user page image!

Great choice! It's beautiful! SarahStierch (talk) 22:15, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New Documents from the Gerald Ford Library

Hi

I work at the Gerald Ford Presidential Library and Museum, and we are uploading materials to Wikimedia Commons. We have a number of documents that might be of interest to you - they are located at Documents at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library and Museum. If you are interested in writing articles/stubs, I may be able to provide you with pictures from our archives as well. We have a limited number of artifacts uploaded, at Artifacts at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library and Museum. Let me know if I can help in any way, and please feel free to pass the word about these docs; I'd love to see some content generated around them....thanks! Bdcousineau (talk) 00:08, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks great! Thanks for letting me know. Keihatsu ^talk 03:35, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Teahouse Turns One!

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!

	Teahouse First Birthday Badge
	Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:38, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Keihatsu. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Chamal ^T•C 01:59, 5 May 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John L. Withers, II may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:55, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good article

I have been thinking to nominate this article as a good article. I'd be interested in your thoughts on whether you think it is ready since you have some familiarity with the topic. —Zujine|talk 19:56, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I gave the page a quick scan just now. I spotted a few small errors, and might think of some ways to make the coverage more complete, but altogether it looks well written, balanced and reasonably comprehensive. If you want to nominate it, I might have time to do a formal review next week (unless someone else gets to it first, that is). Good luck!

I've nominated the article now in case you want to take a look. Thanks. —Zujine|talk 19:34, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's been nearly a month now, and I haven't seen any updates to the review. I addressed all the issues you mentioned so far. There's no rush on my end, but thought I'd remind you in case you had forgotten.—Zujine|talk 07:12, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am SO sorry. Life just got away from me over the summer and Wikipedia editing just didn't enter into my consciousness. The review will be finished in the next 24 hours. Keihatsu ^talk 06:58, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that the issues you raised appear to have been addressed. When you get the chance, can you check to see where the nomination stands? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:39, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder. I'm happy to report that the review is now complete. Keihatsu ^talk 12:20, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited L. Craig Johnstone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Institute of Politics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Overseas constituency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

3O

Hello, Keihatsu. You have new messages at Alarob's talk page.
Message added 01:09, 16 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

A beer for you!

Thanks for the advice. I did what you said. I now have an empty sandbox again. PeterEltham (talk) 12:30, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you!

Thank you for providing WP:3O and clearing the main list. I see that you've volunteered occasionally 4-5 times since 2012 and it is much appreciated. Good day, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly request

Hello Keihatsu! I've noticed you around! I'm currently working on a project to bring as much of the wiki up to HTML5 compliance as I can. I've noticed that your signature uses some obsolete and deprecated elements, and I'm wondering if I can get you to update your signature. If you're willing to bring your signature up-to-date, I suggest replacing:

[[User:Keihatsu|<span style="color:black; font-size:small;">'''Keihatsu'''</span>]]  <sup>[[User_talk:Keihatsu|<span style="color:#999999;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sup>

with:

[[User:Keihatsu|<b style="color:#000; font-size:small;">Keihatsu</b>]]  <sup>[[User talk:Keihatsu|<b style="color:#999;">talk</b>]]</sup>

which will result in a 137 character long signature (6 characters shorter) with an appearance of: Keihatsu ^talk

compared to your existing 143 character long signature of: Keihatsu ^talk

— Either way. Happy editing! — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 17:53, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Very kind of you to say something. Thanks! Keihatsu ^talk 22:43, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please join the discussion on Talk:Glengarry Glen Ross (film)

Hello Keihatsu, Several weeks ago you responded to a request for a third opinion on the setting of a motion picture. I am inviting you to return and share your opinion again for an RfC that is currently open on the "Glengarry Glen Ross (film)" page.

Response so far in the RfC has been mixed, and insight is needed. Thanks! Xanthis (talk) 16:36, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:International relations

Portal:International relations, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:International relations (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:International relations during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 19:40, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Current Members of the House of Commons of Canada has been nominated for deletion

Category:Current Members of the House of Commons of Canada has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 13:04, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back!

Hi Keihatsu! I saw that you moved your name back into the active column of WikiProject International Relations, and I wanted to welcome you back to Wikipedia editing. It's great to have you back. Let me know if you need anything! Cheers, Pilaz (talk) 20:52, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Pilaz! I'm glad to be back and looking forward to contributing after a long hiatus. Keihatsu ^talk 19:28, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]