User talk:Nohomers48/Archive 2008/09

J-XX

Hi Nohomers48. I've just reverted a change you made to the J-XX article because Wikipedia does not favour one particular set of English spelling rules over another. The policy is not to change from one national variety of English to another, unless the subject of an article is specific to a particular region (for example, our article on Abraham Lincoln should use US English spelling and vocabulary). Since the J-XX article was contributed in British English and is not about a US topic, the policy is to leave it in British English. --Rlandmann (talk) 01:36, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's no problem; you seem new here, so there's no way you could have been aware of the policy (which is why I pointed it out! :) )

FWIW, however, the Macquarie Dictionary reports that both "program" and "programme" are used in Australian English, and that "program" reached Australian English via American English. --Rlandmann (talk) 13:30, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pholcidae

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Pholcidae. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Yachtsman1 (talk) 06:00, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cleared up, sorry for the confusion. I left warnings on the vandal pages.Yachtsman1 (talk) 06:08, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Common year starting on Monday‎‎

Hello. I see you edited Common year starting on Monday‎‎ to return to the template format. Whilst I agree that the your version looks better than the previous one, we are having a discussion about what the page should contain at Talk:Common year starting on Monday which you may wish to join. The points there also apply to the similar pages Common year starting on Tuesday, Leap year starting on Monday, etc. Certes (talk) 13:25, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiBirthday

I saw from here that it's been exactly one year since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 14:32, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

M4/M203

I have moved the discussion to the correct venue (Articles for deletion); it is now located at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M4/M203. Cheers, –Black Falcon ^(Talk) 18:18, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:AKMS.png

Thanks for uploading File:AKMS.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Firearms

Welcome to the WikiProject Firearms. I hope you enjoy being a member.--LWF (talk) 16:59, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Korean People's Navy Ensign.gif

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Korean People's Navy Ensign.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

MfD nomination of Template:User ADFMember

Template:User ADFMember, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User ADFMember and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User ADFMember during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. B (talk) 20:26, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please update your status with WP:VG

Dear WikiProject Video games member,

You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in recent months.

The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.

All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:

Editing video game-related pages in the Article namespace
Participating in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)

Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

—WikiProject Video games (delivery by xenobot 03:39, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm

O RLY? --SamB135^Talk_Contribs 07:37, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, you're good. --SamB135^Talk_Contribs 07:41, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'm gonna start a new wiki page. --SamB135^Talk_Contribs 07:42, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Zealand - Malaysia Free Trade Agreement --SamB135^Talk_Contribs 07:46, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. --SamB135^Talk_Contribs 07:47, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

T-55s in Cape Verdean service

Hello.

Could you tell me where you got the information about T-55s being in service with the Cape Verdean army? I'm asking because I didn't find anything in my sources.

Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 23:09, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There doesn't seem to be any actual references supporting this information. None of the references in the article you mentioned say anything about T-55s being in Cape Verdean service.

Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 16:15, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it was sourced it's still very vague. It doesn't mention exactly what medium tanks Cape Verde got. We only presume they were T-55s.

Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 01: 07, 22 December 2009 (UTC)