User talk:Nicoddemu

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Nicoddemu, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains (talk) 23:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

I would strongly suggest you learn what a reliable source is. "genea.net", Medlands, rootsweb are examples of unreliable sources. Please refrain from adding unsourced information, information sourced from unreliable websites, or copying of sources from other articles that do not support what you are writing(ie. source misrepresentation). --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Stephen, Count of Blois. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint about your edits on my talk page

Please see User talk:EdJohnston#A concern, An editor states that you are adding unsourced, unverified information to articles. You may respond there if you wish. If it is true that you are making unsourced changes, you are risking a block. The concern is that you might be deliberately adding wrong information to articles. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:43, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reverting at Odo I of Furneaux to add a citation to a book by Régine Le Jan. (See this Google Books link). The book by Le Jan does not contain the word 'Furneaux', so your reference seems faulty and should be removed. People may claim you are guilty of reference falsification. EdJohnston (talk) 01:55, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Carolingians descended from Charles Martel

Please don't add commentary or a to-do list to articles. You can add them to the talk page which is (should be) for discussion on improving the article talk:Carolingians descended from Charles Martel. See help:talk pages and wp:talk page guidelines Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 05:56, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nicoddemu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nicoddemu. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bernard of Senlis

The article Bernard of Senlis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:DEL#7 & WP:DEL#8

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nightvour (talk) 21:41, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Eudes II, Seigneur of Ham

Hello, Nicoddemu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eudes II, Seigneur of Ham, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:08, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eudes II, Seigneur of Ham

Hello, Nicoddemu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eudes II".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]