Jump to content

User talk:Nergaal/Archive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9

WikiCup Newsletter XXXVI

WikiCup 2010 June newsletter

We're half way through 2010, and the end of the WikiCup is in sight! Round 3 is over, and we're down to our final 16. Our pool winners were Ian Rose (submissions) (A), Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) (B, and the round's overall leader),Colombia ThinkBlue (submissions) (C) New South Wales Casliber (submissions) and New Orleans TonyTheTiger (submissions) (D, joint), but, with the scores reset, everything is to play for in our last pooled round. The pools will be up before midnight tonight, and have been selected randomly by J Milburn. This will be the toughest round yet, and so, as ever, anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Though unaffiliated with the WikiCup, July sees the third Great Wikipedia Dramaout- a project with not dissimilar goals to the WikiCup. Everyone is welcome to take part and do their bit to contribute to the encyclopedia itself.

If you're interested in the scores for the last round of the Cup, please take a look at Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2010/Round 3 andWikipedia:WikiCup/History/2010/Full/Round 3. Our thanks go to Bavaria Stone (submissions) for compiling these. As was predicted, Group C ended up the "Group of Death", with 670 points required for second place, and, therefore, automatic promotion. This round will probably be even tougher- again, the top two from each of the two groups will make it through, while the twelve remaining participants will compete for four wildcard places- good luck everyone! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17

FLRC

I have nominated List of 1936 Winter Olympics medal winners for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.

Hugo Award for Best Professional Editor

Hi, you commented on Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Hugo Award for Best Professional Editor/archive1, could you return to it to support or oppose? I don't like to bother people into !voting, but the list has been at FLC for a month and a half. Thanks!

Talkback

Hello, Nergaal. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Triple_Crown/Nominations#Wikipedia:WikiProject_Elements.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Nergaal. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Elizabeth II Good Article

I am reviewing Elizabeth II as a good article (). You can view the discussion at Talk:Elizabeth II/GA3.

Rcsprinter (Reviewer) (Talk) 21:00 31 January 2011


Welcome to the 2011 WikiCup!

Hello, happy new year and welcome to the 2011 WikiCup! Your submissions' page can be found here and instructions of how to update the page can be found here and on the submissions' page itself. From the submissions' page, a bot will update the main scoresheet. Our rules have been very slightly updated from last year; the full rules can be found here. Please remember that you can only receive points for content on which you have done significant work in 2011; nominations of work from last year and "drive-by" nominations will not be awarded points. Signups are going to remain open through January, so if you know of anyone who would like to take part, please direct them to Wikipedia:WikiCup/2011 signups. The judges can be contacted on the WikiCup talk page, on their respective talk pages, or by email. Other than that, we will be in contact at the end of every month with the newsletter. If you want to stop or start receiving newsletters, please remove your name from or add your name tothis list. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 12:58, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup flag

Hey, some people were concerned about the flag you are using in the WikiCup, and it doesn't actually meet the current rules anyway (which were designed to prevent any kind of controversy). I've changed it to the regular Japanese flag for now, but I am happy to change it to any other flag which meets the current rules. J Milburn (talk) 18:16, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

I've switched it to a modern Afghan flag, as the rules did specify that they have to be contemporary flags. J Milburn (talk) 12:36, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:FTC-icon

Template:FTC-icon has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 23:01, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

FLC revisit request

Hello! Thank you for your comments at my nomination of List of current sovereign monarchs. I believe most of the issues you presented have been resolved. Could you please revisit your comment on the page, and let me know if there is anything else to consider before the administrators make their decision? Thanks again, Nightw 03:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject triple crown

Hi, I noticed that you have an application for a Special edition WikiProject triple crown. Please list all of the articles that each editor has contributed for. Follow the example here. Provide evidence for each as per the regular triple crown. Thanks. –SMasters (talk) 14:30, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi, are you still interested in pursuing this? If not, I will remove it. If you are, I will be happy to create the award for you. Please let me know. I will remove it in the next few days if I don't hear anything. Cheers. – SMasters (talk) 03:06, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Dacian script

Thanks for the neutral opinion. I've been working to set up the WikiProject Dacia to organize better the articles about Dacia and improve their quality. We need help expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more images. Maybe you find it interesting and wish to join. Thanks and best regards! --Codrin.B (talk) 22:35, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Roman Dacia

This user helped promote Roman Dacia to good article status.

Well done. What I read about Roman Dacia was substantially in the article. It would be worth the time and effort to put in the page numbers on the cites - but that's not really a GA issue, so that doesn't hold up the pass. SilkTork *YES! 17:08, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the hard work on the article and for bringing it to good article status! --Codrin.B (talk) 22:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Request

Hey. would you mind putting Wikipedia:Featured topics/Star Wars episodes at FTRC? Since I close noms I try not to open as well if I can help it.Wizardman Operation Big Bear 05:11, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Fluorine peer review

Hey there, would you mind helping with fluorine by peer reviewing it? I guess, that may be of a little interest for you since you're signed to WikiProject Elements. Although a review from would be very helpful, don't worry if you can't make one; but, if possible, please do so. --R8R Gtrs (talk) 15:14, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of current sovereign monarchs/archive1

Hi Nergaal. I have restarted the above FLC because the consensus was unclear. Can you revisit it to ensure that all of your comments have been addressed, and if possible, declare whether you support, oppose, or are neutral towards the list's promotion to FL status? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 22:53, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Contact

Hi Nergaal, please mail me via Wikipedia email system. I have an info for you. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:15, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 January 2011

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Premiers of the Soviet Union/archive2

Hi Nergaal. You commented at the above FLC on its first go-round, which failed due to lack of consensus. If possible, can you take a quick look at the list again and ensure that your concerns have been resolved? Thanks for all that you have done for the FL process. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 23:41, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program is looking for new Online Ambassadors

Hi! Since you've been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, I wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.

If that sounds like you and you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors during the current term, which started in January and goes through early May. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

I hope to hear from you soon.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 01:16, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Foundation of Moldavia GAR

Hello. Foundation of Moldavia has received a Good Article Review. It is proposed the article be failed due to the poor readability of its prose throughout the article. It also has significant (fixable) problems with the copyright status of its images. Please visit the review page to join the discussion. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:05, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Elements Triple Crown

Your Majesty, I am pleased to award this special edition platinum triple crown toWikiProject Elements and its hardworking volunteers. – SMasters (talk) 10:00, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for all your hard work. May you wear the crowns well, and may the platinum crown motivate you to contribute more outstanding articles. –SMasters (talk) 10:00, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 January newsletter

We are half way through round one of the WikiCup. Signups are now closed, and we have 129 listed competitors, 64 of whom will make it to round two. Congratulations to The Bushranger (submissions), who, at the time of writing, has a comfortable lead with 228 points, followed byZanzibar Hurricanehink (submissions), with 144 points. Four others have over 100 points. Congratulations also go to Greece Yellow Evan (submissions), who scored the first points in the competition, claiming for Talk:Hurricane King/GA1, Principality of Sealand Miyagawa (submissions), who scored the first non-review points in the competition, claiming for Dognapping, and United Kingdom Jarry1250 (submissions) who was the first in the competition to use our new "multiplier" mechanic (explanation), claiming for Grigory Potemkin, a subject covered on numerous Wikipedias. Thanks must also go to Jarry1250 for dealing with all bot work- without you, the competition wouldn't be happening!

A running total of claims can be seen here. However, numerous competitors are yet to score at all- please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. The number of points that will be needed to reach round two is not clear-everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 22:39, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2011

Talkback

Hello, Nergaal. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of selected stars for navigation/archive1.
Message added 06:43, 1 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Empire of Brazil

Nergaal, I added a small sentence to the main text of the article that explains what territory from present-day Brazil was missing during the Imperial era in Empire of Brazil#Foreign relations. Here is the piece of text I added. I believe this is what you were looking for.

Thank you very much for taking your time to review the article. Kind regards, --Lecen (talk) 14:15, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

I added an extra note into the lead to explain the difference in territory between the Empire of Brazil and present-day Brazil. --Lecen (talk) 17:23, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Elizabeth II

I have conducted a GA review of Elizabeth II. Unfortunately, I determined that it did not meet the good article criteria, and it was not listed. I found serious issues that made it clear that the article could not be considered stable. As I said in my review, if the article was stable, I would pass it. While I don't like to see an article fail its fifth GA nomination, I feel that once the current issues are resolved, it will have a substantially better chance of being listed. Sixth time's the charm (hopefully). Regards, Swarm X 15:50, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 February 2011

Review

Please see this--Brunswick Dude (talk) 23:31, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 February 2011

ITN: Watson (artificial intelligence software)

-- tariqabjotu 23:50, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Polonium RSC.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Polonium RSC.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 02:50, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Actinium RSC.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Actinium RSC.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 02:54, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 February 2011

please help torsion field article

The article have no reliable sources as pseudoscientific concept. Shipov`s Torsion field research was not disbanded and will never be (it becomed private) due to the 1991 eastern "revolutions" the Soviet Union itself dissolved (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comunism)! The ultimate truth is that torsion technology is the best and used by NASA(US), Cern LHC (top European Scientifical Experiments),Russian Research Institute of Space Systems, in one word everyone uses Akimov and Shipov`s work, the only technology provided with unlimited funds from KGB (Russia)! Torsion field devices are sold all around the world. In 2010 Chairman of the State Duma and Chairman of the Supreme Council of United Russia, Mr. Boris Gryzlov (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boris_Gryzlov) gave an online interview (http://www.gazeta.ru/interview/nm/s3337459.shtml) «??????.Ru» “Gazeta.ru”,, where he commented the activities of "RANS" - the Russian Commission on Pseudoscience”. Chairman of the State Duma and Chairman of the Supreme Council of United Russia Party Boris Gryzlov denounced the activities of Commission on Pseudoscience of Russian Academy of Science (lead by ) as obnoxious (‘mrakobesy” Rus.) that work against development of Russia and her advances. He further named the commission’s scientific eloquence as “pearls” (an ironic substitute for an “obscene language” used by Commission to intimidate their opponents), which fell down below the intellectual level of top class experts in science.

He got over 6,000 complaints about the Commission’s activities
His Statement:

"The commission does not represent any of the legal departments of the Academy. The commission represents just the interests of few academicians, who stuck together as a group. Judging by the “pearls” of their “eloquences”, I may conclude that they do not perform at a level of the highest class professionals."

Gryzlov stated about his intention to detach “the commission from the Academy” the false group of scientists (the imaginary commission who asks for money from any new invention)! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.233.93.182 (talk) 15:18, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Elephant
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Serengeti Elefantenbulle.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Jujutacular talk 23:51, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

rutherfordium

Good work! We will have a good topic soon. A featured topic some time later. --Stone (talk) 12:27, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 February newsletter

So begins round two of the WikiCup! We now have eight pools, each with eight random contestants. This round will continue until the end of April, when the top two of each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers of those remaining, will make it to round three. Congratulations to The Bushranger (submissions) (first, with 487 points) and Zanzibar Hurricanehink (submissions) (second, with 459), who stormed the first round. Scotland Casliber (submissions) finished third with 223. Twelve others finished with over 100 points- well done to all of you! The final standings in round one can be seen here. A mere 8 points were required to reach round two; competition will no doubt be much more fierce this round, so be ready for a challenge! A special thanks goes, again, to United Kingdom Jarry1250 (submissions) for dealing with all bot work. This year's bot, as well as running smoothly, is doing some very helpful things that last year's did not. Also, thanks to Bavaria Stone (submissions) for some helpful behind-the-scenes updating and number crunching.

Some news for those who are interested- March will see a GAN backlog elimination drive, which you are still free to join. Organised by WikiProject Good articles, the drive aims to minimise the GAN backlog and offers prizes to those who help out. Of course, you may well be able to claim WikiCup points for the articles you review as part of the drive. Also ongoing is the Great Backlog Drive, looking to work on clearing all of the backlogs on Wikipedia; again, incentives are offered, and the spirit of friendly competition is alive, while helping the encyclopedia is the ultimate aim. Though unrelated to the WikiCup, these may well be of interest to some of you.

Just a reminder of the rules; if you have done significant work on content this year and it is promoted in this round, you may claim for it. Also, anything that was promoted after the end of round one but before the beginning of round two may be claimed for in round two. Details of the rules can be found on this page. For those interested in statistics, a running total of claims can be seen here, and a very interesting table of that information (along with the highest scorers in each category) can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:47, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2011

L. Ron Hubbard

Hello,

You recently commented on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/L. Ron Hubbard/archive2 that you felt that the L. Ron Hubbard article was too long. I have reduced it by about 20% to 82 kB (13,353 words) of readable prose text. Please take a look - it would be helpful if you could say on the FAC page whether you feel that this satisfies your concerns. Helatrobus (talk) 23:50, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your participation in the featured article review of L. Ron Hubbard. You might like to know that it is currently being considered as a candidate for the day's featured article on March 13, 2011, on the centenary of Hubbard's birth - see Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests#March 13. You may have a view on the matter. Helatrobus (talk) 00:49, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Angry Birds

Nergaal, why did you put Angry Birds up for GAN? You haven't made any major edits in the page. GamerPro64 (talk) 01:09, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fluorine liquid.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fluorine liquid.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:33, 7 March 2011 (UTC)



The Signpost: 7 March 2011

House episode articles AfD

You have voiced your opinion at Talk:List of House episodes but not yet at the AfD. While not required it would be greatly appreciated. The AfD is located at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paternity (House). Thanks. Xeworlebi (talk) 18:36, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Summer transfers

WHAT? ARE YOU SERIOUS? After all the hard work I've been doing every day for more than two months during the summer and you want to remove it? This type of transfer articles are found on Wikipedia for almost every European football league. Why only the Spanish one? And by the way... what is "notable players" for you? Kaka and Cristiano? What a lack of respect for the other La Liga and Segunda División players who don't have a limitless salary like these two... Qampunen (talk) 11:20, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

File:2011-03-12 1800 NHK Sōgō channel news program screen shot.jpg

Hello, Nergaal. You have new messages at File talk:2011-03-12 1800 NHK Sōgō channel news program screen shot.jpg.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

184.144.160.156 (talk) 05:24, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. RadioFan (talk) 23:19, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Nergaal. You have new messages at RadioFan's talk page.
Message added 23:19, 13 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Signpost: 14 March 2011

Kepler-10 nomination Kepler-4b nomination

Hi, Nergaal.

I just wanted to let you know that User:Nstock and I have addressed all of your comments on the GA Review page of Kepler-10. --Starstriker7(Talk) 01:29, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Oh my gosh. That was a huge flop...I actually meant Kepler-4b. My mistake. --Starstriker7(Talk) 04:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Uploading on the same filename

Please stop uploading images with different content than the original with the same filename. You should upload with a different filename in cases like this. --hydrox (talk) 06:54, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Confusion like this (user asks why does the filename claim date 14 March, while description claims date 16 March) is exactly what I ment above. Please be so kind and reupload with a different filename next time, and flag the old one for non-controversial deletition by simply inserting the tag {{db-f5}} . You can adapt the earlier fair-use template if you will. --hydrox (talk) 23:02, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Fukushima

Hello, Nergaal. You have new messages at File talk:Fukushima I 14 March 2011 satellite image by DigitalGlobe.jpg.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

184.144.160.156 (talk) 11:22, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

FLC review

You have reviewed Philadelphia Phillies all-time roster (E) at WP:FLC. Demands by opposers at that nomination have resulted in a merge. I am asking all commenters to return to the FLC page and re-review if time is available. I appreciate your help and apologize for the inconvenience this has caused you. — KV5 • Talk • 22:33, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 March 2011

Group(Periodic Table)

Hello Nergaal,when editing a page,go down to edit summary,and sum up what you did. Please do this,because we can't tell if you are vandalizing,or making a good edit. Thanks!DarkfireII13 (talk) 16:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Angry Birds GA

Hello,

I have reviewed Angry Birds against the good article criteria. Based on my assessment at Talk:Angry Birds/GA1, I have placed the review on hold to address the concerns raised in the review. The article was reviewed on March 23, 2011, so it will be reassessed seven days from now, on March 30, 2011. Feel free to let me know if you have any comments or questions about the review. Thanks, RJaguar3 | u | t 19:19, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Upper Belvedere LCD.jpg

Hi there. There was an edit added fairly late in this nomination. I'd appreciate it if you could state a preference among the various edits so that I can figure out which one to promote. Thanks. Makeemlighter (talk) 04:34, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Chernobyl radiation map 1996
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Chernobyl radiation map 1996.svg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Jujutacular talk 15:25, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

GAN on Rubidium

Hi Nergaal, have a look I think I got all the points or commented on the ones I left out! Thanks! --Stone (talk) 23:28, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! Na and K will be more challenging.--Stone (talk) 22:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2007 (Canada) FLRC

Could you complete the template with who you have notified of this FLRC, preferably before you transclude it? Thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:14, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

File:2011-03-12_1800_NHK_Sōgō_channel_news_program_screen_shot.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2011-03-12_1800_NHK_Sōgō_channel_news_program_screen_shot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 293.xx.xxx.xx (talk) 20:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Discussion at List of House episodes

There is a discussion underway at List of House episodes about the DVD/Blu-ray table in the article. As a recent contributor to this page your input would be welcomed in the discussion, which you may find at Talk:List of House episodes#Blu-ray nonsence inclusion. Thank you. --AussieLegend (talk) 21:50, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2011

WikiCup 2011 March newsletter

We are half way through round two of the WikiCup, which will end on 28 April. Of the 64 current contestants, 32 will make it through to the next round; the two highest in each pool, and the 16 next highest scorers. At the time of writing, our current overall leader is Zanzibar Hurricanehink (submissions) with 231 points, who leads Pool H. Poland Piotrus (submissions) (Pool G) also has over 200 points, while 9 others (three of whom are in Pool D) have over 100 points. Remember that certain content (specifically, articles/portals included in at least 20 Wikipedias as of 31 December 2010 or articles which are considered "vital") is worth double points if promoted to good or featured status, or if it appears on the main page in the Did You Know column. There were some articles last round which were eligible for double points, but which were not claimed for. For more details, see Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring.

A running total of claims can be seen here. However, numerous competitors are yet to score at all- please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. The number of points that will be needed to reach round three is not clear- everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 01:04, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Astronomy stuffs

Hi, Nergaal.

I just wanted to drop by to let you know that I've addressed most of your comments at Kepler-11e. Also, I've been thinking about expanding into working galaxy pages. Do you have any tips as to what sections I could add on such articles? --Starstriker7(Talk) 20:43, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Coenagrionidae
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Coenagrionidae2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 01:45, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Apis mellifera carnica
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Apis mellifera carnica worker hive entrance 3.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 01:48, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Branchiopoda
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Triops-longicaudatus-dorsal-ventral-edit2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 20:58, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Could you give me a read through of 2012 phenomenon?

I need the input of someone who isn't connected with the article to let me know if the article reads well to the layperson. Do you think you could be my honorary layman? Thanks in advance. Serendipodous 21:02, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Take all the time you need. I'm not going to take this to FAC until I'm sure it's going to pass. Serendipodous 05:58, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

RE:Eschatological. I wish there was a better word, but there isn't really. The topic deals with both doomsday and new age ideas, and eschatological is the only word that (sorta) covers both of them. After the huge number of fights I've had over the precise wording of that line, the idea of spending days trying to come up with a suitable substitute frightens me. Since the word is linked, I think it's OK. Serendipodous 14:13, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks a bundle for your help. Do you think you could give the article a once-over (just put "eschatological" to one side for now :) ) to see if my alterations make any more sense? There are some clarify tags I haven't been able to clear, because I didn't write them and don't have the sources. I've alerted the guy who did write them, but he appears to be on wikibreak.

BTW, PR suggested the alien invasion section be removed. I'm pondering it; the only reason I included it in the first place was because my own father mentioned to me in passing that he'd heard it on CNN, so it seemed like a good idea to crush the rumour before it got out of hand. It seems to have died down since last December, but "SETI 2012 spaceships" still gets 149 results for the past week. What do you think? Serendipodous 09:14, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Bug report

[1]. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 22:44, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 April 2011

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Webcam
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Webcam CT transmissions.OGG, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 23:10, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/St. Michael's Cathedral (Izhevsk)
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Svyato Mihailovsky Cathedral Izhevsk Russia Richard Bartz Alt.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 02:33, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your helpful advice and your support for List of longest rivers of the United States (by main stem), which was promoted to Featured List yesterday. Finetooth (talk) 16:07, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Potential element GANs

could be samarium and protactinium. I abandoned actinium because I couldn't expand it 5x for WP:DYK. Actinide is a translation from the Russian FA article, that is I did not research its content; there were some obvious content problems and some might remain (just FYI). Materialscientist (talk) 03:22, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Kepler-11g nomination

Hey, Nergaal, just wanted to give you a heads-up that I've nominated Kepler-11g for GA. --Starstriker7(Talk) 08:02, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Municipalities of Lithuania/archive1

Hi, you have participated in this FLRC. Some work has been done since. Please review your comments and indicate whether you support keeping or delisting. It would be good to finally close this thing. Thank you. Renata (talk) 14:22, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 April 2011

Talk:Bohrium#On 274Bh's half-life

You recently added isotope 274Bh to the bohrium article, with a half-life of 1.3 min. However, the source given for it only seems to refer to a "lifetime" of 1.3 min for the single nucleus of this isotope that was produced. This would translate to an expected half-life substantially lower (1.3 min*ln(2)≈1 min) (with large error bars, of course), not making it the longest-lived isotope. I'd appreciate a comment by you on this, preferably at the thread I started. Thanks for updating the article, in any case! --Roentgenium111 (talk) 13:16, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Rings of Saturn 2
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Saturn's rings in visible light and radio.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 12:22, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Saturn's rings dark side mosaic.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 12:22, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 April 2011

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Zirconium
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Zirconium crystal bar and 1cm3 cube.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 19:18, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Berkelium metal.jpg

Hello Nergaal, could you move this file to commons. I would like to use the image for de:Berkelium. Many thanks --JWBE (talk) 08:00, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

List of Jewish Medal of Honor recipients FLRC

Hello Nergaal. Can you please provide an update as to your position with respect to this FLRC which you nominated? Thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:59, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Also, while you're there, can you have a look at List of Alberta general elections because it looks like your comments have been addressed there too. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:16, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2011

WikiCup 2011 April newsletter

Round 2 of the 2011 WikiCup is over, and the new round will begin on 1 May. Note that any points scored in the interim (that is, for content promoted or reviews completed on 29-30 April) can be claimed in the next round, but please do not start updating your submissions' pages until the next round has begun. Fewer than a quarter of our original contestants remain; 32 enter round 3, and, in two months' time, only 16 will progress to our penultimate round. Scotland Casliber (submissions), who led Pool F, was our round champion, with 411 points, while 7 contestants scored between 200 and 300 points. At the other end of the scale, a score of 41 was high enough to reach round 3; more than five times the score required to reach round 2, and competition will no doubt become tighter now we're approaching the later rounds. Those progressing to round 3 were spread fairly evenly across the pools; 4 progressed from each of pools A, B, E and H, while 3 progressed from both pools C and F. Pools D and G were the most successful; each had 5 contestants advancing.

This round saw our first good topic points this year; congratulations to Zanzibar Hurricanehink (submissions) and Assyrian people Nergaal (submissions) who also led pool H and pool B respectively. However, there remain content types for which no points have yet been scored; featured sounds, featured portals and featured topics. In addition to prizes for leaderboard positions, the WikiCup awards other prizes; for instance, last year, a prize was awarded to Democratic Republic of the Congo Candlewicke (submissions) (who has been eliminated) for his work on In The News. For this reason, working on more unusual content could be even more rewarding than usual!

Sorry this newsletter is going out a little earlier than expected- there is a busy weekend coming up! A running total of claims can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 19:26, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 May 2011

File:Einsteinium.jpg

Could you please do the rotating and cropping for this as it's clogging up the infobox? Thanks. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 10:48, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Similar to File:Protactinium.jpg? Lanthanum-138 (talk) 10:50, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

Just wanted to say thanks for supporting the Atlantic Coast Conference football championships featured topic. I'll do my best to make sure it's updated once the college football season starts and the next game happens. I'll work on getting the latest article in the series up to FA status so the topic continues to meet the 50 percent barrier. Have a good one! JKBrooks85 (talk) 08:13, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 May 2011

The Signpost: 16 May 2011

FLC comments

Hello. You made not-so-recent comments on Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Benet Academy alumni/archive1. Your further input would be much appreciated. Edge3 (talk) 05:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 May 2011

GTRC

Letting you know that I started a GTRC for Star Wars: Jedi Knight titles. GamerPro64 18:21, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 May 2011

WikiCup 2011 May newsletter

We're half way through round 3 of the 2011 WikiCup. There are currently 32 remaining in the competition, but only 16 will progress to our penultimate round. Scotland Casliber (submissions), of pool D, is our overall leader with nearly 200 points, while pools A, B and C are led by Texas Racepacket (submissions), Zanzibar Hurricanehink (submissions) and Saskatchewan Canada Hky (submissions) respectively. The score required to reach the next round is 35, though this will no doubt go up significantly as the round progresses. We have a good number of high scorers, but also a considerable number who are yet to score. Please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. Also, an important note concerning nominations at featured article candidates: if you are nominating content for which you intend to claim WikiCup points, please make this clear in the nomination statement so that the FAC director and his delegates are aware of the fact.

A running total of claims can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:33, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

WP Elements in the Signpost

"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject Elements for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Other editors will also have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 17:14, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Addition of photo of Großhesseloher Brücke to article Munich Tramway

Hi.

Back on the 25th March you added a photograph (File:Grosshesseloher Brücke R B.jpg) to the article Munich Tramway. Unfortunately you didn't add a caption, so I'm not sure why you added it to that article, but my best understanding is that the Großhesseloher Brücke pictured is a railway bridge.

The only connection I can see to Munich's tramways is that there is a nearby tramstop (on a tram line that neither passes over nor under the bridge) named after the bridge, which doesn't seem enough to justify the use of the photograph in the article. I'm guessing that this is a case of mistaken identity. The train passing over the bridge in the photo does look rather tramlike, but is in fact a Bayerische Oberlandbahn diesel train.

I have removed the photograph from the article; if there is another connection I've missed please feel free to reinstate it, but could I ask you to add a caption explaining the connection. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 09:15, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 June 2011

Orphaned non-free image File:Fluorine liquid.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fluorine liquid.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:06, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 June 2011

Hey

Hey, I notice you haven't edited in a few months. Everything ok? Feeling some Wikipedia-fatigue? J Milburn (talk) 00:16, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 June 2011

The Signpost: 27 June 2011

WikiCup 2011 June newsletter

We are half way through 2011, and entering the penultimate round of this year's WikiCup; the semi-finals are upon us! Points scored in the interim (29/30 June) may be counted towards next round, but please do not update your submissions' pages until the next round has begun. 16 contestants remain, and all have shown dedication to the project to reach this far. Our round leader was Scotland Casliber (submissions) who, among other things, successfully passed three articles through featured article candidates and claimed an impressive 29 articles at Did You Know, scoring 555 points. Casliber led pool D. Pool A was led by Ohio Wizardman (submissions), claiming points for a featured article, a featured list and seven good article reviews, while pool C was led by Norway Eisfbnore (submissions), who claimed for two good articles, ten articles at Did You Know and four good article reviews. They scored 154 and 118 respectively. Pool B was by far our most competitive pool; six of the eight competitors made it through to round 4, with all of them scoring over 100 points. The pool was led by Zanzibar Hurricanehink (submissions), who claimed for, among other things, three featured articles and five good articles. In addition to the four pool leaders, 12 others (the four second places, and the 8 next highest overall) make up our final 16. The lowest scorer who reached round 4 scored 76 points; a significant increase on the 41 needed to reach round 3. Eight of our semi-finalists scored at least twice as much as this.

No points were awarded this round for featured pictures, good topics or In the News, and no points have been awarded in the whole competition for featured topics, featured portals or featured sounds. Instead, the highest percentage of points has come from good articles. Featured articles, despite their high point cost, are low in number, and so, overall, share a comparable number of points with Did You Know, which are high in number but low in cost. A comparatively small but still considerable number of points come from featured lists and good article reviews, rounding out this round's overall scores.

We would again like to thank United Kingdom Jarry1250 (submissions) and Bavaria Stone (submissions) for invaluable background work, as well as all of those helping to provide reviews for the articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please do keep using it, and please do help by providing reviews for the articles listed there. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews generally at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup.

Two final notes: Firstly, please remember to state your participation in the WikiCup when nominating articles at FAC. Finally, some WikiCup-related statistics can be seen here and here, for those interested, though it appears that neither are completely accurate at this time. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:37, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 July 2011

The Signpost: 11 July 2011

The Signpost: 18 July 2011

The Signpost: 25 July 2011

WikiCup 2011 July newsletter

We are half way through the penultimate round of this year's WikiCup; there is less than a month to go before we have our final 8. Our pool leaders are New Zealand Adabow (submissions) (Pool A, 189 points) and Russia PresN (submissions) (Pool B, 165 points). The number of points required to reach the next round is not clear at this time; there are some users who still do not have any recorded points. Please remember to update your submissions' pages promptly. In addition, congratulations to PresN, who scored the first featured topic points in the competition for his work on Thatgamecompany related articles. Most points this round generally have, so far, come from good articles, with only one featured article (White-bellied Sea Eagle, from Scotland Casliber (submissions)) and two featured lists (Hugo Award for Best Graphic Story, from PresN and Grammy Award for Best Native American Music Album, from Another Believer (submissions)). Points for Did You Know and good article reviews round out the scoring. No points have been awarded for In the News, good topics or featured pictures this round, and no points for featured sounds or portals have been awarded in the entire competition. On an unrelated note, preparation will be beginning soon for next year's WikiCup- watch this space!

There is little else to be said beyond the usual. Please list anything you need reviewing on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, so others following the WikiCup can help, and please do help if you can by providing reviews for the articles listed there. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews generally at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup- points are, of course, offered for reviews at GAC. Two final notes: Firstly, please remember to state your participation in the WikiCup when nominating articles at FAC. Finally, some WikiCup-related statistics can be seen here and here. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 11:39, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 August 2011

The Elder Scrolls IV: Shivering Isles - Issues

Hi there. I know you appear inactive, but you're the largest contributor to the article The Elder Scrolls IV: Shivering Isles, so I wanted to leave the message anyways. Recently, and IP mentioned that there was an upcoming FAC for the article when he put it up for copyediting. I took a look at the article, and... well what I saw was an article with a gaping hole. Please view my comment at the bottom of the talk page. I'm going to give that a chance to be fixed, but I'm quite tempted to take it to GAR for failing criteria 3a (major aspects covered).

I'm also G.W. (second most active on the article) and MuZemike (the GA reviewer).

Thank you for your time. Sven Manguard Wha? 08:10, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 August 2011

The Signpost: 15 August 2011

The Signpost: 22 August 2011

The Signpost: 29 August 2011

WikiCup 2011 July newsletter

The finals are upon us; we're down to the last few. One of the eight remaining contestants will be this year's WikiCup champion! 150 was the score needed to progress to the final; just under double the 76 required to reach round 4, and more than triple the 41 required to reach round 3. Our eight finalists are:

  • Scotland Casliber (submissions), Pool A's winner. Casliber has the highest total score in the competition, with 1528, the bulk of which is made up of 8 featured articles. He has the highest number of total featured articles (8, 1 of which was eligible for double points) and total did you knows (72) of any finalist. Casliber writes mostly on biology, including ornithology, botany and mycology.
  • Russia PresN (submissions), Pool B's winner and the highest scorer this round. PresN is the only finalist who has scored featured topic points, and he has gathered an impressive 330, but most of his points come from his 4 featured articles, one of which scored double. PresN writes mostly on video games and the Hugo Awards.
  • Zanzibar Hurricanehink (submissions), Pool A's runner-up. Hurricanehink's points are mostly from his 30 good articles, more than any other finalist, and he is also the only finalist to score good topic points. Hurricanehink, as his name suggests, writes mostly on meteorology.
  • Ohio Wizardman (submissions), Pool B's runner-up. Wizardman has completed 86 good article reviews, more than any other finalist, but most of his points come from his 2 featured articles. Wizardman writes mostly on American sport, especially baseball.
  • Principality of Sealand Miyagawa (submissions), the "fastest loser" (Pool A). Miyagawa has written 3 featured lists, one of which was awarded double points, more than any other finalist, but he was awarded points mostly for his 68 did you knows. Miyagawa writes on a variety of topics, including dogs, military history and sport.
  • Canada Resolute (submissions), the second "fastest loser" (Pool B). Most of Resolute's points come from his 9 good articles. He writes mostly on Canadian topics, including ice hockey.
  • Greece Yellow Evan (submissions), who was joint third "fastest loser" (Pool A). Most of Evan's points come from his 10 good articles, and he writes mostly on meteorology.
  • Australia Sp33dyphil (submissions), who was joint third "fastest loser" (Pool B). Most of Phil's points come from his 9 good articles, 4 of which (more than any other finalist) were eligible for double points. He writes mostly on aeronautics.

We say goodbye to our seven other semi-finalists, Another Believer (submissions), Poland Piotrus (submissions), United Kingdom Grandiose (submissions), Bavaria Stone (submissions), Norway Eisfbnore (submissions), Saskatchewan Canada Hky (submissions) and Wisconsin MuZemike (submissions). Everyone still in the competition at this stage has done fantastically well, and contributed greatly to Wikipedia. We're on the home straight now, and we will know our winner in two months.

In other news, preparations for next year's competition have begun with a brainstorming thread. Please, feel free to drop by and share any thoughts you have about how the competition should work next year. Sign ups are not yet open, but will be opened in due course. Watch this space. Further, there has been a discussion about the rule whereby those in the WikiCup must delcare their participation when nominating articles at featured article candidates. This has resulted in a bot being created by new featured article delegate Ucucha (talk · contribs). The bot will leave a message on FAC pages if the nominator is a participant in the WikiCup.

A reminder of the rules: any points scored after August 29 may be claimed for the final round, and please remember to update submission pages promptly. If you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 00:09, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 September 2011

The Signpost: 12 September 2011

The Signpost: 19 September 2011

The Signpost: 26 September 2011


WikiCup 2011 September newsletter

We are on this year's home straight, with less than a month to go until the winner of the 2011 WikiCup will be decided. The fight for first place is currently being contested by Principality of Sealand Miyagawa (submissions), Zanzibar Hurricanehink (submissions) and Australia Sp33dyphil (submissions), all of whom have over 200 points. This round has already seen multiple featured articles (1991 Atlantic hurricane season from Hurricanehink and Northrop YF-23 from Sp33dyphil) and a double-scoring featured list (Miyagawa's 1948 Summer Olympics medal table). The scores will likely increase far further before the end of the round on October 31 as everyone ups their pace. There is not much more to say- thoughts about next year's competition are welcome on the WikiCup talk page or the scoring talk page, and signups will open once a few things have been sorted out.

If you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 12:47, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 October 2011

The Signpost: 10 October 2011

The Signpost: 17 October 2011

The Signpost: 24 October 2011

WikiCup 2011 October newsletter

The 2011 WikiCup is now over, and our new champion is Zanzibar Hurricanehink (submissions), who joins the exclusive club of the previous winners: Dreamafter (2007), jj137 (2008), Durova (2009) and Sturmvogel_66 (2010). The final standings were as follows:

  1. Zanzibar Hurricanehink (submissions)
  2. Australia Sp33dyphil (submissions)
  3. Greece Yellow Evan (submissions)
  4. Principality of Sealand Miyagawa (submissions)
  5. Ohio Wizardman (submissions)
  6. Scotland Casliber (submissions)
  7. Canada Resolute (submissions)
  8. Russia PresN (submissions)

Prizes for first, second, third and fourth will be awarded, as will prizes for all those who reached the final eight. Every participant who scored in the competition will receive a ribbon of participation. In addition to the prizes based on placement, the following special prizes will be awarded based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, the prize is awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round.

No prize was awarded for featured pictures, sounds or portals, as none were claimed throughout the competition. The awards will be handed out over the next few days. Congratulations to all our participants, and especially our winners; we've all had fun, and Wikipedia has benefitted massively from our content work.

Preparation for next year's WikiCup is ongoing. Interested parties are invited to sign up and participate in our straw polls. It's been a pleasure to work with you all this year, and, whoever's taking part in and running the competition in 2012, we hope to see you all in January! J Milburn and The ed17 00:46, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2011

2011 WikiCup participation

Awarded to Nergaal, who reached round 3 in the 2011 WikiCup.

It was good to have you on board this time around- we hope you enjoyed the competition! In case you are interested, signups for next year are open. Thanks, J Milburn and The ed17 20:55, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 November2011

The Signpost: 14 November 2011

Talkback

Hello, Nergaal. You have new messages at Talk:Roman Dacia.
Message added 16:36, 21 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi. I think you have been involved a lot with the GA of Roman Dacia. We need help to salvage the article.Thanks. Codrin.B (talk) 16:36, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 November 2011

The Signpost: 28 November 2011

Hi Nergaal

Hi Nergaal, you missed a lot of fun in the wikicup and a nice interview in the signpost during your break. Hope to get a little work in the periodic table soon. --Stone (talk) 21:21, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

I also scaled back my work by a factor of 10, but it is still a lot of fun!--Stone (talk) 10:26, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 December 2011

The Signpost: 12 December 2011

The Signpost: 19 December 2011

The Signpost: 26 December 2011

Rollback on my edits

I noticed you rolled back my edits on WP:ELEM/PTQ without an edit summary. There was a discussion on WT:ELEM about changing those three entries to natural radio due to a source in astatine. I was curious as to why you assumed my change was vandalism. StringTheory11 00:16, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

I did not assume it is a vandalism, but an error. I was not aware of the discussion at the WP. Nergaal (talk) 20:19, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Sorry about that, probably should have put a link to the discussion in the edit summary. StringTheory11 01:07, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

2012 WikiCup

Hi! As you've previously expressed interest in the competition, I'm just letting you know that the 2012 WikiCup is due to start in less than 24 hours. Signups are open, and will remain so for a few weeks after the beginning of the competition. The competition itself will follow basically the same format as last year, with a few small tweaks to point costs to reflect the opinions of the community. If you're interested in taking part, you're more than welcome, and if you know anyone who might be, please let them know too- the more the merrier! To join, simply add your name to Wikipedia:WikiCup/2012 signups, and we will be in touch. Please feel free to direct any questions to me, or leave a note on the WikiCup talk page. Thanks! You are receiving this note as you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Please feel free to add or remove yourself. EdwardsBot (talk) 01:24, 31 December 2011 (UTC)


GA status

Nergaal, I would happily nominate those two articles for GA status but you would have to do the review because I am currently busy. Jessy (talk) (contribs) • 21:27, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

Psilocybe cyanofriscosa

Hello, Nergaal. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Psilocybe_cyanofriscosa.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Could PH2 b Be Potentially Habitable - Or Not?

Copied from Talk:PH2 b#Could PH2 b Be Potentially Habitable - Or Not:

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nergaal/Archive_6&oldid=1143370022"