User talk:Nemov/Archives/2024/October

October 2024

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. This is a courtesy notification, since you opened the original iteration of the ANI discussion that prompted my reopening. Grandpallama (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Unarchiving advice

Hi, please don't undo the bot's entire edit just to unarchive one section, it archived 3 in that one edit, and please also fix the archive if you do unarchive a section. The bot would eventually have archived all these sections again, generating duplicates in the archive.
I've fixed things for you this time, but if you have to do it again just manually remove a section from the archive and re-add it at ANI. There's a script that does this in just a few clicks too, though I didn't find it in a quick search (sorry).
That's all, thank you. – 2804:F1...79:16B8 (talk) 17:30, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

3rd opinion?

May I asked why you deleted/declines my request for 3rd opinion only hours after I asked for it? Redacted II still insists on putting in original research (after him watching YT videos) into articles and even explains that on talk pages like "List_of_Starship_launches", and when I correct something, he accuses me od edit warring. 47.69.107.97 (talk) 09:06, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

More than two participants. Nemov (talk) 12:13, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Thats not true. Count: Talk:List_of_Starship_launches#Again_"facts"_that_are_guesses 47.67.225.78 (talk) 06:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Not worthy of a mention?

Hey, what makes Tarantino's comments on the new Joker not worthy of a mention, when something like this is:

"Films that Tarantino has commented on negatively include Alfred Hitchcock's Frenzy where he remarked, "... might be a piece of crap, but I doubt Alfred was bored making it". He also disliked two Robert Altman films stating, "Brewster McCloud is the cinematic equivalent of a bird shitting on your head ... and Quintet is just terrible, boring, and pointless"."

Tarantino publicly praised a film that flopped at the box office and flopped critically, as well as saying Phoenix had one of the best performances of all time. I would say that's pretty important to include, especially when we include his comments praising other flopped films. Also numerous news outlets reported this once he stated it, so it clearly is important. Locust member (talk) 12:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

The biography is about a filmmaker that's been around for over 30 years. His opinion about a film that just bombed, that was in the news yesterday, isn't central to the biography. This can be reassessed later, but Wikipedia is WP:NOTTHENEWS. I don't think anyone is going to care about this in ten years. Nemov (talk) 12:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

That's fair, but that would make pretty much that entire section on his page irrelevant, then. I'm sure nobody will care about him favoring The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull over Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade in 10 years. Or the fact he felt uneasy during a scene of Monty Python's The Meaning of Life. Might as well just get rid of those too while we're at it, right? Locust member (talk) 13:04, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

There's plenty of WP:OTHERSTUFF we could discuss that's wrong with that article. Which I've pointed out in TALK. It could use an editor to cut down much of the content that's superfluous. Nemov (talk) 13:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Understandable, thank you! Locust member (talk) 13:16, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Atlanta Braves

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Atlanta Braves you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Paytonisboss -- Paytonisboss (talk) 14:03, 30 October 2024 (UTC)