User talk:Nealpolitan

Guilio Adriani

Hello there. I have taken a look at your article that you created in mainspace, Guilio Adriani, and I do not believe that it is ready for mainspace yet. A large quantity of the article has no references, which, if kept in mainspace, would mean that the content could be removed at any time, per our biographies of living persons policy. In addition, the article heavily promotes the person, using a large amount of words and phrases, that, honestly speaking, amount to puffery. As a result of this, I have moved your article out of mainspace and into the draft space, where your article is available here. Reviewers will examine and give recommendations to your article, and when one considers it good enough to go, it will be published into mainspace.

Second to this, is whether you have a conflict of interest to the person in question, and whether you were paid for this article. The Terms of Use for Wikimedia websites specifically prohibits undisclosed paid editing, see wmf:Terms of Use#4. Refraining from Certain Activities. To quote from WP:PAID, you must disclose who is paying you, who the client is, and any other relevant role or relationship. See WP:COIDISCLOSEPAY for information on how to do this.

Thanks, ^{My name is}not^dave (talk/contribs) 13:46, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giulio Adriani (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Giulio Adriani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 07:16, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giulio Adriani (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Giulio Adriani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 22:43, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nealpolitan, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 22:43, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Giulio Adriani concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Giulio Adriani, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Giulio Adriani

Hello, Nealpolitan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Giulio Adriani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:02, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]