Jump to content

User talk:Naypta/2021/April

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

19:38, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

16:47, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed expansion for translation requests

[edit]

Hi, Naypta. I have a question for you. How hard do you think it would it be enhance the FRS to run off a category of articles needing translation, and send requests to users who sign up by language on a page similar to WP:FRS?

I'm thinking this could either be a major upgrade, or possibly a new bot designed with a very similar structure to Yapperbot, that would handle a new type of trigger, that wouldn't be an Rfc, but category membership. I'm thinking in particular, of articles needing translation, such as those listed in Category:Articles needing translation from German Wikipedia.

What I'm envisioning, is a signup page similar to Wikipedia:Feedback request service, but which would be called Wikipedia:Translation request service. (Or maybe combine them on the same page, under different sections?) On that page, there would be a section "Request for translations" and under that, a series of H3 headers, each one containing one language name in the section header. The contents of section === French ===, for example, would be a series of {{frs user}} templates, added by anyone who wanted to receive a "Translation request" from the server about pages needing expansion or translation from French. Other subsections would cover 'German', 'Spanish', and so on.

The bot would use the same algorithm as it does now for determining who to notify, and how often, and updating their Talk page, but would trigger based on a configurable category, instead of triggering on recent Rfcs. (Since the category would be different per language, you'd need a separate list of them, or, perhaps this could be configured with template {{Rfs lang config|lang-name|category-1|category-2|...}}, with one of them at the top of each language section.)

One major difference between Rfc feedback and translation requests, is that Rfcs expire in a relatively short time (30 days usually), whereas language categories change slowly (months, or years). For Rfc feedback requests, I'm not sure how you currently decide whether a user has already received notification of a given Rfc and whether that same method would also work for translation requests. Some popular languages have so many translation requests that a pseudorandom choice would probably never pick the same article twice. Other language categories only have a handful of members, so you might need some way of cycling through them or keeping context for a given user.

I think a bot task like this would be tremendously helpful in drawing attention to articles in need of translation. Currently, we use WP:PNT, but it's just a list, it's not up to date, stuff that ages off the list never get handled so it's not as efficient, and you don't get "reminders", which I think are key to the benefits of the Feedback request service for Rfcs; after all, people could just go to the list of Rfcs and pick one off the list, but they don't; so I think the bot is really key, here.

So—what do you think, hard to do? Not sure if this would be better handled as a new bot, or maybe just a new "task" for the existing one, since a lot of the processing seems to be so similar. If the latter, that would make "Rfc feedback" task one of the FRS, and "Translations" could be task two. Eager to hear your thoughts. Mathglot (talk) 23:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mathglot: This should probably go to WP:BOTREQ, since Naypta has not edited since August 2020. I'll answer the questions about Yapperbot's current behavior anyway: Yapperbot makes no attempt to decide whether a user has already received notification of a given Rfc, but instead only sends FRS notices once per RfC/GA nom. From what I understand, that approach wouldn't work very well for translation requests since there aren't very many of them. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Pppery: thanks. Once upon a time there were ten thousand French ones (still over 4,000, but some languages have less than five although you'd be surprised at the number from some minor languages (Slovenian: 188). So, it would definitely have to be thought out. Mathglot (talk) 06:06, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been removed from Wikipedia:Local Embassy due to inactivity

[edit]

Hi Naypta! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:Local Embassy, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:Local Embassy.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:03, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21:23, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia technical issues and templates request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Math on a "Wikipedia technical issues and templates" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]