User talk:芄蘭

Controversial move

Please stop your controversial move and use proper WP:RM process, thanks. Matthew hk (talk) 01:00, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page File talk:National anthem of the Republic of China (Taiwan) 中華民國國歌(演奏版).ogg in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. If you cannot provide a translation, please go to the list of Wikipedias, look in the list for a Wikipedia that is in your language, and edit there instead of here. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 01:04, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at China. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:38, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

This is a warning to immediately cease any posting of false information on Wikipedia. Editors should refrain from making false statements on Wikipedia. There are many ways that editors can lie on Wikipedia, such as deliberately using a quote out of context to mislead readers, fabricating a reference, stating content is not included in an article when it actually is, or making untrue accusations about the conduct of another editor. As well, there are many reasons that editors lie: to back up their argument about article content, support their position in a policy discussion, or advance a biased point of view in an article.

Regardless of the ways that Wikipedia editors lie or their reasons (or rationales) for lying, this conduct is harmful to the quality of the encyclopedia, as it can lead to incorrect or biased information in articles. Cases where false information is found in Wikipedia articles hurt the reputation of the encyclopedia. False information added to many types of articles, such as a medical article or a prescription drug article, could have serious real-world consequences. As well, making false, negative statements about a living person can expose Wikipedia to legal issues for defamation.

Lying is also harmful to the online Wikipedia community which edits and develops the encyclopedia. The online community requires editors to work in good faith and behave in a civil manner with each other. When editors make false accusations against other editors on Talk pages, this is the type of negative behavior that can lead to editors leaving the project. As well, when editors are found to have made false claims about holding degrees or other credentials, this can reduce other editors' trust and weaken the reputation of the encyclopedia.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you will be permanently blocked from editing. Yeungkahchun (talk) 19:34, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hi 芄蘭! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. — MarkH₂₁^talk 04:09, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chinese Communist Party, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 06:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]