User talk:NOBLE2
May 2011
[edit]
Your recent edits to several pages could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. WikiPuppies! (bark) 19:44, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
==Reply to Wiki Puppies==Thanks for the suggestion.All the avenues were already attempted. and several other people tried to have the defamatory material removed but they all were blocked as puppets of Kaufmann even before starting the procedure of review of their requests. I have no idea who this Kauffman is. I only know that there are several stockholders of the public company of which Santilli is CEO who tried to have words like , quacker, nut, fringe, discredited physicist and more removed from the Oxyhydrogen Discussion and failed to be even considered since they were immediately blocked as sock puppets. I think the real issue is that when a living person is insulted with defamatory words like it is now happening (since May 16 in the Oxyhydrogen discussion) those words should be immediately removed as matter of abiding to the BLT policy. There should be no need to even point out to the various editors of an article that the words are wrong, there should be no need to go to the noticeboards, to follow various procedures and present supporting evidence of what? that an American citizen, a physicist with several patents to his credit is not a nut case and so on??....Those words should be removed. Period.Sorry if I sound so angry, many people are and all this could be avoided and restore the productive work of the editors and especially, give credibility to the BLP policies. Thanks again. NOBLE2 (talk)NOBLE2NOBLE2 (talk)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:46, 31 May 2011 (UTC)You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.
- I would like to add that, if you want to file a legal claim against Wikipedia itself, or a request for removal of material which you claim is illegal, the proper channels can be found in the appropriate subpage of WP:Contact us. (I wish that were in the {{uw-legal}} expansion, as it seems appropriate.) — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:52, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. Several other people tried to have the defamatory material removed but they all were blocked as puppets of Kaufmann. I have no idea who this Kauffman is. I only know that there are several stockholders of the public company of which Santilli is CEO who tried to have words like , quacker, nut, fringe, discredited physicist and more removed from the Oxyhydrogen discussion and failed to be even considered since they were immediately blocked as sock puppets. I think the real issue is that when a living person is insulted with defamatory words like it is now happening (since May 16 in the Oxyhydrogen discussion) those words should be immediately removed as matter of abiding to the BLT policy. There should be no need to even point out to the various editors of an article that the words are wrong , there should be no need to go to the noticeboards, to follow various procedures and so on....Those words should be removed. Period. Thanks again. NOBLE2 (talk)NOBLE2NOBLE2 (talk)
Last Lost Somebody told you that you would not be able to edit and that you would be chased away from editing. Sorry. Go to the page of Wikimedia Chairman and tell why you are no longer editing.NOBLE2 (talk)Noble2NOBLE2 (talk)