User talk:Mvcg66b3r/Archives/2019/June
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Mvcg66b3r. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
KONG TV & KBTC TV
Mvcg66b3r, I am wondering why my factual edits are continually reversed. I am new to this. I am not trying to be promotional as I don’t own any stakes in Canadian IPTV operator Cipher TV. I had only added the information as I know that those stations had not previously been available for viewing in Canada. I provided citations to show that the information is true. If you want, you are welcome to format the information properly if that is needed! Thank you! TacomaMarsh (talk) 01:24, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Again, Wikipedia is not a TV guide. That being said, KBTC and KONG may be carried on other providers in Canada. We don't want to make a list of them. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:27, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
So why do we see references to Comcast or Wave? That would make it a TV guide in terms of the stations carriage in Washington State? From my knowledge what I posted is the first instance of those stations being viewed in Canada. I could have made it more generic but without the references, I think those would have been removed as well. I was trying to be factual and helpful. If you have a better way to get across what I was trying to convey, please feel free. Not trying to get in a editing war! Just kind of mystified as to what is wrong with my edits! Respectfully, TacomaMarsh!
June 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Do not white wash articles Praxidicae (talk) 16:02, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Praxidicae: What article are you talking about? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:09, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Specifically, this article and edit. Not news doesn't apply here especially considering it's been covered by several other independent sources, most notably the Washington Post. Praxidicae (talk) 16:13, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Praxidicae: It was poorly written. I cleaned it up the best I can. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:16, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Can you please explain why you completely removed the controversy, then? Because poorly written content doesn't mean you get to white wash it. Praxidicae (talk) 16:18, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Praxidicae: I put it back in and cleaned it up for better reading. If you were offended, my apologies. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:22, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Can you please explain why you completely removed the controversy, then? Because poorly written content doesn't mean you get to white wash it. Praxidicae (talk) 16:18, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Praxidicae: It was poorly written. I cleaned it up the best I can. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:16, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Specifically, this article and edit. Not news doesn't apply here especially considering it's been covered by several other independent sources, most notably the Washington Post. Praxidicae (talk) 16:13, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. --Charitwo (talk) (contribs) 16:23, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
XEWT-TDT
Hello, I reverted your edit to XEWT-TDT which removed the live stream from the External Links. This NOT (repeat NOT) a promotional link, it is a live feed coming officially from XEWT. Would you call all the links to the radio station live audio webcasts promotional? I don't think so. The next time before reverting please discuss it first on the article's talk page. Thank you for your cooperation. YborCityJohn (talk) 22:04, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Georgia Public Broadcasting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:34, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Restoring edits made by a sock puppet
Please note that when you restore edits made by a sock puppet, you take ownership of those edits. Keep this in mind. If I would have blocked the sock puppet for making those edits, I will block you for making them. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:03, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
- @NinjaRobotPirate: At KEYC-TV, I was just removing unsourced content which may have been put there by mistake. I'm nobody's sockpuppet. If you were offended, my apologies. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:08, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
- Per WP:BANREVERT, I am allowed to revert any edit made by a sock puppet. I clearly stated that I was doing this in my edit summary. You reverted my edits, restoring the content made by a sock puppet. That's perfectly fine, and you are 100% allowed to do that. However, you are now taking complete responsibility for those edits. Any sanctions that I would have done on the sock puppet would instead be done on you, since you've accepted responsibility for the edits. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:20, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
- @NinjaRobotPirate: But you restored unsourced info (by mistake, of course). Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:27, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
- Per WP:BANREVERT, I am allowed to revert any edit made by a sock puppet. I clearly stated that I was doing this in my edit summary. You reverted my edits, restoring the content made by a sock puppet. That's perfectly fine, and you are 100% allowed to do that. However, you are now taking complete responsibility for those edits. Any sanctions that I would have done on the sock puppet would instead be done on you, since you've accepted responsibility for the edits. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:20, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Slow down.
Or get a coffee, seems you're making mistakes; Just warned someone on WP:RCP who reverted the vandal you intended to warn. :-) Promethean (talk) 13:44, 25 June 2019 (UTC)