User talk:MusicLover2207

September 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Bianca Ryan, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 🖖 07:28, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Bianca Ryan (album), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 🖖 07:28, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Since you can no longer reply, I'm adding this here: when your main account, Farell01, is able to edit again, you must read up on the policies of an encyclopedia. To respond directly to your message on my talk page: please see Wikipedia's relevance guidelines; the background data on Ms. Ryan is already in her own article, where it belongs, and is not relevant to her album's article (Wikipedia is an encylopedia and not a fan site; as such, there are policies and guidelines for individual articles). Meantime, there is a steadfast policy on the use of original research and, as a peripheral, synthesizing a conclusion that is not supported by a reliable source. In short, we cannot conclude that, because Tuned In Music and Media released Ryan's single in 2010, the affiliation remains in place in 2015—in fact, the available evidence demonstrates the contrary. Unless you can provide a reliable source that shows beyond a doubt that the affiliation continued beyond 2010, any such assumption violates encyclopedic policy. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 🖖 07:52, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]