User talk:Mrmike1695

Mrmike1695, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mrmike1695! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:17, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Mrmike1695, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Big L have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 03:38, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Big L. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 07:08, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Big L has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 07:25, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Big L, you may be blocked from editing.

Stop using misleading edit summaries. You are not fixing typos. bonadea contributions talk 07:43, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm positive this user's phone's browser setting autofills that field. It was confusing at first how/why someone could think that's what they were doing, but I'm pretty sure it's just laziness and ignorance of what they are doing. I doubt they've ever seen an edit history or get any of the communication. JesseRafe (talk) 06:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Big L. Especially your use of NPOV and weasel words, e.g. "Classic" to describe his debut, which doesn't belong in a section heading anyway. JesseRafe (talk) 23:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:JesseRafe. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. JesseRafe (talk) 09:01, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, I'm Noq. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tupac Shakur, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not change dates in articles without providing a source or at least an explanation in the edit summary of why it is wrong noq (talk) 13:29, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of L Corleone

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Aerospeed (Talk) 01:38, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Eminem, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Chamith (talk) 06:08, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Leaders of the New School. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STOP - do not keep changing dates without a proper source. Describing all unsourced changes as typos is not acceptable. noq (talk) 07:23, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Tupac Shakur has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 12:34, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lifestylez ov da Poor & Dangerous. NeilN ^{talk to me} 12:41, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruption from Mrmike1695. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:10, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genre in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Big L. Please cease your disruptive edits. This article's text clearly states one date, why do you keep changing the date in the infobox? JesseRafe (talk) 18:00, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/205.197.242.157. Just cross-posting this. This user has an obvious pattern. Don't know if it is intentional or not, or just not signed in, as the user and IP both use canned edit summaries each time. Obvious fixation on dates, changing infoboxes but not article etc, leaving contradictions chronological and logical across the articles, ignoring MOS etc etc. Clearly same person, no attempt to disguise. JesseRafe (talk) 19:25, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Big Pun. Dialogue is impossible with this user JesseRafe (talk) 14:06, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Beginnings: The Lost Tapes 1988–1991. JesseRafe (talk) 14:21, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Due to your continual failure to engage with the Wikipedia community about your edits which have been found by several editors to be incorrect and disruptive,

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

As noted in the block template above, if you can make a convincing case that you will contribute as a member of the community going forward (which means, in part, addressing concerns when they are brought to your attention, and following Wikipedia policy), then feel free to write an unblock request. —Darkwind (talk) 20:36, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]